What are its implicit and explicit assumptions? Which points are most controversial or political? What theoretical or conceptual critiques could you make about the report? How are issues of gender, race and class handled ?

For the critical evaluation, think about: Who is the report for? Who might agree or disagree with it? What are its implicit and explicit assumptions? Which points are most controversial or political? What theoretical or conceptual critiques could you make about the report? How are issues of gender, race and class handled ? What have been the wider reactions to the report from academics, journalists, civil society groups or politicians? You do not have to cover all these issues, but think about how to make your report interesting and informative. You must remain focused on reviewing the report, rather than writing a general development essay.

For an example of one way to critically review a report of this sort, see:

Klees, S. (2017) ‘A critical analysis of the World Bank’s World Development Report on education’, Bretton Woods Project. Available online at https://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/2017/11/critical-analysis-world-banks-world-development-report-education/