The Supervaluaionist View of Vagueness

Paper detalis:

1. Summarize Vagueness as understood in Philosophy and Introduce why it’s an important philosophical debate.

2. Write (roughly one- two paragraphs) about what view of vagueness you find most convincing. Write at the end and underline it.

3. Argue for your thesis, the view of vagueness that you find most cogent and why.

4. Defend your thesis and view from the differing views of vagueness. Why is this one more cogent or plausible than the others?

Use the below resources (A, B, and C) and anything else you find helpful online regarding the topic of vagueness, but cite ALL sources used INCLUDING those listed here:

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/vagueness/

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sorites-paradox/

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sorites-paradox/https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/sorites-paradox/