Do you think that quality would be adversely impacted if the growth in medical technology were to be constrained in the United States for one year?

We have learned that new technology is the number one reason for escalating health care costs in America.

Do you think that quality would be adversely impacted if the growth in medical technology were to be constrained in the United States for one year?

If these costs could be reduced, and more people could gain access, do you think that this would be a reasonable trade-off? Would you pay a higher premium to ensure that you would always have access to the most recent diagnostic and curative technology?