Do you agree or disagree with Hart’s critique? Do you consider it to be a fair and accurate representation of Austin’s work – to therefore, be a valid criticism in itself?

Essay on Professor Hart’s Legal Theory

In this part of my lecture,  going to be talking about Hart’s critique of John Austin. You need to have a sound grasp of John Austin’s work yourselves. This is the command theory of law chapter in the module guide in chapter three. Also, think about Austin in relation to his work with Jeremy.
Bentham. One of the most important things you need to do is to think for yourselves on these points and on this issue. Do you agree or disagree with Hart’s critique? Do you consider it to be a fair and accurate representation of Austin’s work – to therefore, be a valid criticism in itself?