Based on the Abstract, countries overview (Excel sheet), and provided materials and its related literature, write an article with the following structure Introduction; •Literature review; • Methodology; • Results and Discussion; • Conclusion + 1 Table with countries/ applied nomads visa policies overivew

Instructions: Based on the Abstract, countries overview (Excel sheet), and provided materials and its related literature, write an article with the following structure Introduction; •Literature review; • Methodology; • Results and Discussion; • Conclusion + 1 Table with countries/ applied nomads visa policies overivew

Is an ideal society one where people are free from interference or one where people are free from domination?

Description

two exam questions to be answered in 1000 words each. no referencing is needed but academic sources should be used to support answers in text, like use the name of the scholars. please ensure that the material provided is used as well.

1. Is an ideal society one where people are free from interference or one where people are free from domination?

2. Is colour-blindness an ideal that society should strive towards?

Define or identify the general topic,issue,or area of concern, thus providing an appropriate context for reviewing the literature.

Mental health and poverty (To be phrased better by writer)

LITERATURE REVIEW: Write a 3 to 4 page literature review based on a minimum of eight sources: empirical articles reporting the results of original, primary research, found in peer reviewed, scholarly journals. The topic should be narrowed by reviewing the literature, so start broadly. It must be approved by me. You may choose qualitative and / or quantitative articles. You may choose a topic within your area of specialization within the social sciences.
Think of your literature review as the introduction to a larger work on the topic. It should:

1) Highlight the importance of the subject (why is it important to study this topic?).
a. Define or identify the general topic,issue,or area of concern, thus providing an appropriate context for reviewing the literature.
b. Make sure you start with a thesis statement: Take a critical point of view about the literature some perspective from which you organize your review. Note: You can only do this after you have spent considerable time analyzing your literature!

2) Situate your topic within the wider body of scholarly literature (historical time period,place, culture). Point out trends in what has been published about the topic; or conflicts in theory, methodology, evidence, and conclusions; or gaps in research and scholarship; or a single problem or new perspective of immediate interest.

3) Describe and critically assess:
a. The major theoretical approaches to the topic.
b. The main empirical findings of the body of research on your topic. Summarize major contributions in the area, maintaining the focus established in the introduction in other words, do not list the results of the studies one by one, but group similar results together. Or, demonstrate that findings are not similar, and point out the ways in which they differ, and why (different methodologies, samples, theoretical assumptions, etc.).
c. The methods used to study the subject, including an assessment of whether these methods affect the outcomes (that is, if you studied the topic using different methods, would the results be different?)
d. To the extent you can with your small number of sources, evaluate the current “state of the art” for the body of knowledge reviewed, pointing out major methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings, and areas or issues pertinent to future study. Eight studies are not enough to be really certain about your findings, but do what you can. Qualify your analysis with statements like “based on the small number of studies reviewed, this area appears to neglect X” or “The major strength of this body of research is …” or “The findings in this area fall into three major groups …”
In other words, acknowledge the limitations of what you are doing.

4) Use a minimum of eight primary research sources drawn from the social science literature
(this can include criminology, political studies, global studies, etc.). Primary sources are those where the authors present the results of their own original research. You may also use other non-peer reviewed articles in your discussion, in addition to the eight key sources.

5) Avoid articles that are drawn from the pure science and medicine literature journals such
as Science, Nature, The New England Journal of Medicine, etc. (unless the articles are clearly social science in focus check with me first).

6) Include the abstract and citation information as an addendum to your References if it has not been reviewed by me in the uploaded Draft Bibliography.

Demonstrate the following skills and abilities: effectively make interpretations about trends in global public health issues from reliable sources of health data.

Global Public Health

1. Demonstrate the following knowledge and understanding
Awareness of the differences in patterns of health and disease around the world and how these have been influenced by historical and geographical factors.

2. Demonstrate the following skills and abilities: effectively make interpretations about trends in global public health issues from reliable sources of health data

Discuss the drivers of the changing relationships between mainstream Australia (government, non-Indigenous business & people) and Australia’s First Peoples.

REFLECTION: The importance of Australia’s First Peoples in Australian history and culture.

Task Description:

You are required to provide a position statement of 500 words to reflect on the importance of Australia’s First Peoples in Australian history and culture.

You will need to choose one of the topics below to respond to:

OPTION A:

The importance of awareness and appreciation of Australia’s First Peoples

Discuss the importance of awareness,appreciation and inclusion of Australia’s First Peoples to the history and culture of Australia.

Outline recommendations and priorities for Australia to continue to strengthen their relationship with Australia’s First Peoples

OPTION B:

The relationship between Australia’s First Peoples and mainstream Australia over time

Discuss the drivers of the changing relationships between mainstream Australia (government, non-Indigenous business & people) and Australia’s First Peoples.

Outline recommendations and priorities for Australia to continue to strengthen their relationship with Australia’s First Peoples

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: The aim of this exercise is to develop a short reflection that outlines your response to the questions. You will need to use literature to support your responses to the questions. When you present research, make sure you are critical- we discuss ‘being critical’ in our workshops. All research presented must be referenced properly referenced using APA referencing, with in-text references and a reference list.

Word limit: 500 words (+/-10%)

You require a minimum of four (4) sources. This can include journal articles, book chapters, government reports, websites and the modules.

In-text references ARE included in word limit

Do not use first person

The first three modules are very useful in completing this task. To reference module content, please use the following in your reference list:

Griffith University (2021 or 2022). Engaging Australia and the Asia Pacific: Module X. Accessed XXX (date) from xxxxxxx

Tips for success

We discuss the assignment items extensively in class- it is essential that you attend to ask questions and join in the activities

Please attend the consultation hours with your tutors if you need further clarity

If you should require an extension, please apply via the following link

Need assistance with structure, researching and referencing, contact the Library via this link

Discuss policy and legislation addressing the specific type of inequities and identify gaps in policy and legislation

Health Issues in Gender, Age and Ethnicity-Ethnic minority women and maternity care

2,000-word individual report. You will write a report discussing health inequities in relation to gender, age or ethnicity. You are required to choose one of the health issues listed below, explore the nature of health inequities in relation to gender, age or ethnicity, discuss policy addressing the inequities and make suggestions for improvement.

‘Access to health care’ could be interpreted as health care in general OR access to a specific treatment or specific service.

• You are required to:

• Choose a health issue that is closely related to gender, age or ethnicity-based inequities in health.

• Critically discuss the nature and the extent of health inequities in relation to gender, age or ethnicity.

• Demonstrate knowledge of relevant policy and make suggestions to address gaps in current policy.

KEY CRITERIA:

Think about discrimination in health care in relation to gender, age or ethnicity OR think about age, gender OR ethnicity-based disparities that exist in relation to specific health issues

• discuss a health issue related to gender, age or ethnicity-based inequities in health and inequality to the access of health care

• Explore the nature and the extent of health inequities in relation to the chosen health issue. The discussion must focus on health inequities related to gender, age or ethnicity.

• Discuss policy and legislations addressing the inequities (it is suggested that you explore developments in policy aimed at tackling the health inequities)

• You only need 1 variable (Age OR Gender OR Ethnicity)

• Make suggestions for improvement (find gaps and limitations of current policy and make suggestions for improvement)

• So, think about a health issue that is experienced differently by different age groups, different gender OR different ethnic groups.

• Discuss how the chosen topic is related to gender, age or ethnicity-based inequities in health (link your discussion to only ONE type of health inequity)

– Explore the nature and the extent of health inequities in relation to the chosen health issue. The discussion must focus on health inequities related to gender, age or ethnicity (you should focus on only ONE of the three variables).

– Discuss policy and legislation addressing the specific type of inequities and identify gaps in policy and legislation

(It is suggested that you explore developments in policy aimed at tackling the health inequities you discussed)

– Make suggestions for improvement that can fill the gaps in policy and legislation

• You must use a minimum of 10 academic sources (i.e., only peer-reviewed journal articles count). You are encouraged to carry out wider reading. On top of the 10 journal articles, you can also include books and other credible sources (e.g., reports from international organisations) but they will NOT be counted as part of your 10 academic sources.

• Ensure that all your sections are linked – e.g., if you chose a topic that is related to gender-based health inequity, you are expected to explore that topic from the gender-based health inequity perspective only. No other variables, such as age and ethnicity, are expected to be included in your work.

• Ensure that you include your in-text references. In all cases, in-text references must match up with what appears in your reference list. Every in-text citation/reference should correspond to a reference on the list at the end (and vice versa).

• You must use the Harvard referencing system. The University officially advises students to use the following website for referencing guidelines:

• No more than 5% of your work should be in the form of quotes.

• You must write in your own words. You are reminded that plagiarism of any type will be penalised and result in a fail.

• Now you must include the page number within the bracket of an in-text citation, when you paraphrase, or the page range, if you are summarising content of a couple or more pages.

Demonstrate the knowledge and understanding of differing social groups’ experiences of health and/or healthcare in the United Kingdom.

2,000 words
On completion of this unit, you should be able to:

1. Demonstrate the knowledge and understanding of differing social groups’ experiences of health and/or healthcare in the United Kingdom

2. Demonstrate the skills and abilities associated with critical analysis and synthesis of relevant literature and policy, and identification of gaps in current policy

Demonstrate how does this topic influence future social work practice?

Research question;
What is the effect of parental substance abuse/misuse on children?

Marking criteria

You are required to undertake a limited literature review of published primary research relevant to the research topic, demonstrating in-depth and systematic understanding and rigorous critical evaluation and synthesis of research knowledge.

Contextualise the chosen topic with reference to current practice evidence, prevalence data (where appropriate), related theory, and relevant legislation and policy.
Accurately describe the relevant research methodology underpinning this project, outline specific search strategies, and data-analysis methods.

Critical review of research findings;
Demonstrate depth and systematic understanding of the topic through rigorous evaluation and synthesis of identified primary research findings drawing independent conclusions, and identifying recommendations and areas for future research.
While writing, make sure you;
Demonstrate professionalism in the project.
Make reference to SWEPS, BASW PCFs, KSS and professional values.
Demonstrate the ability to take systematic approach on research.
Critically compare, contrast and analyse research studies.
Demonstrate how the research applies to practice, how it impacts future research and its relevance to social work practice.
Demonstrate how does this topic influence future social work practice?
Identify knowledge gaps of this topic.
Identify what legislations and practice theories apply to the topic?

The conclusion should include the implication of the topic to social practice.
Recommendations should be specific. That is name the area which it is needed and explain how it benefits future practice.

Use subheadings for better understanding and clarity.
Do not introduce new literature in the discussion if it was not in the background. Therefore, make sure you introduce all literature in the background that you will want to use in your discussion. New literature can be introduced in the rest of the write up but not in the discussion part.