Explain a situation in life where someone presented you with an argument based on a biased sample .What does this tell us about sampling and making public arguments?

Sampling, Hypothesis Testing, & Data Management

This will be a detailed discussion worth 10 points so plan accordingly.
Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

⦁ Explain your understanding of hypothesis testing and the Type 1 and Type 2 errors.  Use an example from your own life or work to illustrate the concepts.  Use that example to address the following ideas noted in section 8.2 of your text:  Step 1: State the hypotheses by listing your null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis
Step 2: Set the criteria for a decision.
Step 3: Compute the test statistic.
Step 4: Make a decision.

⦁ Explain a situation in life where someone presented you with an argument based on a biased sample
⦁ What happened in this scenario?
⦁ How did you handle it?
⦁ What does this tell us about sampling and making public arguments?

What are teratogens and how might they affect normal prenatal development? How important is attachment for healthy development? Does divorce always have a negative effect on children?

Developmental psychology. 3 mini-essays

But journal articles should be used and referenced in text and in reference list.

What are teratogens and how might they affect normal prenatal development?
How important is attachment for healthy development?
Does divorce always have a negative effect on children?

What is this section about? What is the author saying in this section?What evidence is provided to advance the argument?

Before you are able to analyze an argument you must be able to summarize it. Good summaries include a description of the author¶s ideas including any claims made by the author. Good summaries also review evidence used to advance the argument.
To prepare to summarize the text, read it to get a general idea about the points. Then, reread the text and mark it up by circling key terms and underlining claims. Finally, chart individual paragraphs or sections and examine the overall structure of the text. As you read, take note of:
x What is this section about? What is the author saying in this section?
x What is the author doing in this paragraph or section?
x Does the author make a claim? What does he or she argue? Make note of central claims.
x What evidence is provided to advance the argument?

Describe which of Piaget’s stages of cognitive development they are targeting. Explain WHY you think they are appropriate for this stage based on Piaget’s descriptions of the stages. The chart below should help you.

For your initial posts:
Choose TWO toys from the list below.
Describe which of Piaget’s stages of cognitive development they are targeting.
Explain WHY you think they are appropriate for this stage based on Piaget’s descriptions of the stages. The chart below should help you.

For this Discussion you won’t be able to see other students’ posts until your post yours. If you’re unsure if you’re on the right track or not feel free to email Dr C or come to office hours for feedback!

Explore cycles of grief and different types of grief and loss.Write to the scoring guide for this assignment to address all of the requirements for this assignment.

Build upon your case presentation from Week 6. Incorporate what you have learned about grief, loss, and trauma. Think about and discuss the ways in which you might mitigate impacts to yourself and your clients into your case presentation.

1. Write a case presentation of the Rivera family.
2. Use the Rivera family case study and Interactive Learning Module: Riverbend City: Rivera Family Case Study Part II to assess, identify, and diagnose grief and loss.
3. Explore cycles of grief and different types of grief and loss.
4. Consider cultural and ethical considerations when identifying which type of systemic intervention you might choose in this situation.
5. Write to the scoring guide for this assignment to address all of the requirements for this assignment.
6.You may use writing from your week six assignment in this paper.

What are you hoping to learn from the evaluation? What decisions do you expect to make as a result of the evaluation? What do you need to do to provide evidence of the completion of your project?

To clarify the purpose of your evaluation, start by identifying what you need to learn in the short and long term. Review your Evaluation SOW and Timeline.
Key items to think about when writing your purpose are:
Make sure to include decision makers, the decisions at hand, and projects being evaluated.
What are you hoping to learn from the evaluation?
What decisions do you expect to make as a result of the evaluation?
What do you need to do to provide evidence of the completion of your project?

Identify the problem space in the literature that was used to define the problem statement and develop the research questions.

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
Refer to the potential research design you drafted as an assignment in a previous course.
Retain this paper for reference in future courses.
Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral-level writing. These chapters contain essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.
This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
Directions:
Write a report in which you:
Identify the problem space in the literature that was used to define the problem statement and develop the research questions.
Describe how your study will fit with and contribute to or advance the current literature or body of research.

What is your mission to best serve your clients?

Writer, the instructor modified the assignment by creating an alternative option due to the pandemic. The original assignment contained fewer slides and a paper. However, in the alternative option, he increased the number of slides but did not speci

Alternative to Mental Health Agency Visit

As a reminder, we aren’t requiring the onsite visit as there isn’t a safe way to do so during a pandemic. Here is an alternative for you and the details for the alternate assignment:

Directions for Assignment 1
As an alternative to the onsite visit due to the pandemic, you are going to create a mental health agency that you think would be helpful in the area you are interested in. For example, if you are interested in dual diagnosis agencies be sure to include this in your search.  If you are interested in working with children, create an agency that serves children.  Your fictional agency could be a private practice, a substance abuse treatment facility, a psychiatric hospital, clinic, or any environment you envision would help your target population.

Create a PowerPoint Presentation
The PowerPoint presentation must have a minimum of 15 slides, must be designed using a pleasing color format and type face, and must include the information below. The information for SLIDE 1 is specifically designated and it is recommended that students use the order outlined below to create the presentation.
The name of the fictional agency you created with a location of the agency , hours of operation, and mission statement of the agency you create.  What is your mission to best serve your clients?
Additional Slides are dedicated to:

Identify a personal, educated stance on the topic, and then support it with relevant research.Discuss the legal and psychological significance.

This is a Signature Assignment Paper..Any topic on controversial issues in forensic psychology

The purpose of the Controversial Issues in Forensic Psychology paper is to describe a controversy or debate in forensic psychology, including the legal and psychological significance. An example of a controversy in forensic psychology would be, “Should a child be able to testify as an eye witness?” or “Should incompetent defendants be committed indefinitely?” Your paper should address the following:

Identify the relevant research on each side of the controversy.

Evaluate and reflect on the findings.

Identify a personal, educated stance on the topic, and then support it with relevant research.

Discuss the legal and psychological significance.
The Controversial Issues in Forensic Psychology paper requires considerable research and critical thinking. You should not base the majority of your paper on personal opinion. Your arguments should be based on data, expert opinion, and other peer-reviewed sources.

Support your analysis with at least five peer-reviewed references.