What about their similar and different views of political legitimacy — consent, representation, authority. What is the role of government for each? Who is the sovereign?

Comparison of Locke and Hobbes

You might play with H’s sense of expectation vs. L’s sense of trust.

Careful on Loke’s sense of rights and powers — certainly Hobbes has that perspective. Locke’s is a bit more ambiguous.

What about their similar and different views of political legitimacy — consent, representation, authority.

What is the role of government for each? Who is the sovereign?

Pleanty here to work with.

Write a scientific paper about what causes economic growth and/or human development. The paper should include a quantitative analysis of the significance of these causes.

Advanced polititcal economy

Graded assignment in comparative political economy at master level!

This is the assignment details:

“Write a scientific paper about what causes economic growth and/or human development. The paper should include a quantitative analysis of the significance of these causes.

The dependent variable is optional, but it should be an indicator of human development.
Successful candidates should have clearly defined variables derived from different theories with multiple references. The paper should be well structured, preferably in IMRAD-style.

Write a scientific paper about what causes economic growth and/or human development. The paper should include a quantitative analysis of the significance of these causes.

Advanced comparative political economy – Graded assignment

Graded assignment in comparative political economy at master level!

This is the assignment details:

“Write a scientific paper about what causes economic growth and/or human development. The paper should include a quantitative analysis of the significance of these causes.

The dependent variable is optional, but it should be an indicator of human development.
Successful candidates should have clearly defined variables derived from different theories with multiple references. The paper should be well structured, preferably in IMRAD-style. It should be sufficient for a top mark to do a multivariate model estimated by OLS, but candidates who try to do more advanced models should be rewarded.”

Write a five step-essay on How a Bill Becomes Law at the California State Legislature.

Write a five step-essay on How a Bill Becomes Law at the California State Legislature.

1. An introductory paragraph, which includes a thesis statement identifying the three subtopics. Students will choose three separate steps in the legislative process for their subtopics. Underline the thesis statement.

2. Three paragraphs, with each one discussing one of the three subtopics.

3. A concluding paragraph that summarizes the essay.

 

Write a literature review papers pertaining to Has Federalism in the USA evolved from Dual to Cooperative?

Has Federalism in the USA evolved from Dual to Cooperative?

OVERVIEW
An important part of your study is to base research on scholarship past and present. For the Christian statesman, the added requirement is that the research incorporate the demands of Scripture. To both survey the relevant scholarship and the Scripture that informs it, researchers conduct reviews of scholarly materials to inform their research and to identify where their research fits within the framework of scholarship. Toward that end, the student will write a series of literature review papers that pertain to federalism and their chosen area of public policy.

INSTRUCTIONS
You will write a literature review papers pertaining to Has Federalism in the USA evolved from Dual to Cooperative? in Turabian Author-Date style: two short papers and one final literature review paper. The two short assignments will provide feedback on writing the final literature review paper. All papers will include a title page, body of paper, appendix, and list of references; the last literature review assignment will include an abstract.

Is Elazar’s model of federalism the best model that we have reviewed so far in upholding a Christian worldview? If you agree, provide at least three reasons from scripture with support for each reason.

In the field of federalism and intergovernmental relations, the Christian statesman needs to read leading works in the field with an aim of identifying key concepts related to federalism and evaluating those concepts from a Christian worldview. Toward that end, the purpose of the Book Review Assignment is to evaluate a leading work in the field of American federalism and place it in the framework of a Christian worldview that is informed by the framer’s views of human nature and limited government. To aid in that goal the Book Review Assignment will require that a set of “prompts” be answered from a point of view about the book. The response to these prompts should be thorough and demonstrate a mastery of the book’s content and the ability to evaluate the work from a Christian worldview.
INSTRUCTIONS
Write a book review for Exploring Federalism by Daniel Elazar that addresses and answers the following questions:
• How does Elazar’s model of federalism compare to other leading models we have encountered in the course thus far? Present a summary of Elazar’s model. Then contrast Elazar’s model with two other theories/models of federalism from the past three module’s assigned readings. Pick the two theories/models that you think are the most important rivals to Elazar’s.
• Is Elazar’s model of federalism the best model that we have reviewed so far in upholding a Christian worldview? If you agree, provide at least three reasons from scripture with support for each reason. If you disagree, do the same. One of your reasons for disagreeing could be that you think that another model does the job better. If that is true, state and describe the preferred model, along with why it is preferable.

What were his purposes and did these run with or against the grain of history?

American Presidency

President Barack Obama is my choice for the greatest President.

In this course we examined, among other things, the powers of and limits on the American presidency, as well as the relationships between the president and other major actors in the political system. And we studied presidential leadership during time of war and crisis.

Now it is time to appraise and evaluate.

In paragraph/essay form, please thoroughly answer the following:

–Which of our forty-six presidents do you believe is the greatest?[1] And why do you believe so? Submit a cogent argument for your position.

–What were his purposes and did these run with or against the grain of history?

–what was his “feel” for the nature of his power in the circumstances of his time?

–what was his stance under pressure in office?

–what was his legacy?