Are there aspects of socio-political reality that one methodology can answer that the other cannot?Are there certain research questions better suited to one or the other?

Qualitative versus quantitative methodology

Answer the following prompt in an essay of 2-3 double-spaced pages. Essays may be longer if you like, but a comprehensive answer should be a minimum of 2-3 pages. You should refer to course readings, videos, and/or lectures to illustrate your points. No additional sources are necessary, but you are free to use additional work if you would like. Include all works referenced or quoted in a works cited page. The exam is due in Dropbox by Saturday, 11/13, at 11:59pm (Tuesday class) and Sunday, 11/14 at 11:59pm (Thursday class). No late essays will be accepted. Will be submitted to Turnitin.com

An enduring debate exists within the social sciences between proponents of qualitative versus quantitative research methods. Each camp believes its methodology is inherently better at understanding the social and political world. What do you think are the greatest strengths and weaknesses of each methodology? Are there aspects of socio-political reality that one methodology can answer that the other cannot?Are there certain research questions better suited to one or the other? Do you believe one is always preferable?

Identify the primary problems that each man believes face African Americans.

MLK vs. Malcolm X

Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X both addressed the position of African-Americans in America. Despite the similarity of their concerns, significant differences exist in their approaches to advancing the interests of African-Americans.

Identify the primary problems that each man believes face African Americans. Then explain how each man proposes that white and/or black Americans should address these problems. Finally,carefully consider the positive and negative aspects of each approach. Drawing from this consideration, identify which approach that you favor and explain why. (Make sure that you acknowledge both the advantages and drawbacks inherent in your favored approach.)

Describe the techniques and standards used by NIST to protect federal networks.

Formulate a discussion forum in APA 7 format using the required reading and any other reliable resources with a minimum of 250 words.

Describe the techniques and standards used by NIST to protect federal networks.

Evaluate the Enhanced Risk Management Models used by NIS.

Provide an overview of the practicality of these models, will they work, or are there gaps in the protection of networks?

What could be done or could have been done to stop things before they got as far as they did?

Lesson 12 discussion 817

Directions

Answer questions below in 1 page answer question below. On second page reply to each student in 1 paragraph for both students must have a reply. You can agree or disagree for each reply. Reply to student as if you are speaking to them. Will attach readings and student replies below.

Question

Why do you think AQ Khan got so far in his efforts to become the “Walmart of proliferation?” What could be done or could have been done to stop things before they got as far as they did?

What are the limits (legal/constitutional/political) to a president’s ability to take unilateral action?


Refer to the comments from the instructor and rewrite the parts needed

Prompt: In the United States presidents not only have informal policy-relevant powers such as agenda-setting and formal policy powers such as the veto, but also powers to make policy unilaterally, such as issuing an executive order. Please write a paper in which you analyze the role of the U.S. president in setting public policy with or without the support of Congress. Contemporary debates on immigration reform offer important case studies for examining the limit and power of executive-branch policy action. Choosing immigration reform as your issue focus, please assess how presidential leadership and authority have helped or hindered these reforms and how you might advise the president today. In your essay, please consider the following questions:

What incentives do presidents have to act unilaterally or not act at all,and under what circumstances?

What are the limits (legal/constitutional/political) to a president’s ability to take unilateral action?

Using clear evidence, can you show which interest groups and what messages are informing the president’s policy action or inaction on your chosen policy issue?

In your conclusion, explain the implications of your argument for immigration advocates. What would you advise these advocates to do now to advance their agendas? For example, how might you advise the student leaders of immigration advocacy movements? This analysis should include a discussion of both political strategy and specific policy proposals.