Compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the theories and definitions of human security noted in our readings.

Midterm Exam

Write a cohesive 4 page essay (no cover page/ with a work cited) on what “Human Security” is and what does it seek to explain and/or replace. Compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of the theories and definitions of human security noted in our readings.

Using SEVERAL theories of human security and different ideas about sovereignty, the “state” and the various ideas about the use of forces, write an essay that lays out the core logic and causal arguments of Human Security and places it in historical and practical context. In short, what is it, what isn’t it, what does it explain, and how might it actually work in the state system in which it is being promoted. USE THE PROVIDED LITERATURE TO INFORM THE ARGUMENT OF YOUR PAPER.

How does the Political and Economic situation of Venezuela be a threat in the future for the United States National Security?

Venezuela Paper

Need a scholarly research paper that is approximately 25-30 pages in length not counting the bibiography (35 maximum). This research paper will be written by following these sequential steps:

Selecting a research topic
formulating a problem statement, research question, and thesis statement/hypothesis.
choosing a methodology & developing a brief research design
identifying and organizing the debates and themes within the scholarly literature
writing a literature review
developing the argument
editing and drafting the paper
conducting a proper peer review
producing a finished, polished paper

Research Question
How does the Political and Economic situation of Venezuela be a threat in the future for the United States National Security?
Paper must be written in Harvard Style

Compared with other factors,how important was the Holocaust in the establishment of Israel in 1948?

Compared with other factors,how important was the Holocaust in the establishment of Israel in 1948?

Essay of 2500 words,10% inclusive of footnotes and exclusive of bibliography. Worth 50% of the grade for this module.

You are encouraged to make use of and evidence 6-15+ strong scholarly sources (academic journal articles and books), and you must respect the School of Humanities referencing parameters. For sources see Units/Reading.

Document analysis – Palestine under the British Mandate in the 1920s and 1930s.

All students should read Chapter 3 of Charles Smith, Palestine and the Arab-Israeli Conflict (2020), pp. 215-240 online (pp. 103-162). BibliU – Reader

Want Team 1 to take notes above all on the section titled ‘EUROPEAN CRISES AND THEIR REPERCUSSIONS: YISHUV EXPANSION AND ARAB REBELLION’ (pp. 215-229 online, 129-140 hard copy). Using this section, come prepared to discuss DOCUMENT 3.2 PALESTINE ROYAL (PEEL) COMMISSION REPORT July 1937′ (pp. 254-258 online, 155-158 hard copy).

Want Team 2 to take notes above all on the section titled ‘BRITAIN RETHINKS ITS OBLIGATIONS: THE 1939 WHITE PAPER’ (pp. 230-235 online, pp. 140-144 hard copy). Using this section, come prepared to discuss DOCUMENT 3.3 THE 1939 WHITE PAPER’ (pp. 259-264 online, 158-162 hard copy).

Critical analyse after every point

Talk about Zionism ,the military,diplomatic and moral contributors the creation of Israel

Explore ww2 relevance to the creation of Israel

Colonialism and the British mandate

Write a 5 page paper that will evaluate one particular article in the assigned text of your choosing which you are to critique.

Is voting important?

Write a 5 page paper that will evaluate one particular article in the assigned text of your choosing which you are to critique.

Positive or negative,the student is to consider the article and give a review of the concepts within the article. The better and more honestly the concepts are evaluated the better the grade will be. Prior to attempting the paper each topic is to be cleared with the instructor to avoid clustered attempts by multitudes of students on any given topic.

Will upload pictures of the books article that needs to be responded to in the attachments.

When was a time when you struggled to sleep?Why was this?What might the cause have been?Was it linked to any emotional trouble?

Act 2, Scene 1 Activity 1: Review what has happened in the play so far.

Discuss: When was a time when you struggled to sleep?Why was this?What might the cause have been? Was it linked to any emotional trouble?

Activity 2: Read Act 2, Scene 1 of Macbeth. (Audio) Discuss: The symbolism of sleep in this play is significant. We often struggle to sleep when out minds are distrubed with troubles. Keep note that many of the characters in this play suffer from this and it symoblizes their haunted minds, guilt or worries.

Activity 3: Annotate Macbeth’s Soliloquy, Act 2, Scene 1, Lines 33-63

• Annotate the meaning of what he is saying.

• Make note of any key symbols or motifs.

• Comment on any key visual images.

• Comment on tone/mood.

• Any questions you have about what he is saying?
Discuss answers as a class.

How should innovators with a fierce sense of ambition handle the criticisms and objections that inevitably come their way and make sure that confidence does not turn into bombast?

The Congressional Medal of Honor

These are head-spinning times for those of us who think about the best ways to lead and the most effective ways to compete. What defines acceptable personal behavior (let alone behavior worth emulating) among public officials? Why would executives at so many iconic organizations Volkswagen, Wells Fargo, FIFA +tolerate behavior so egregious that it threatens the very future of their organizations? How should innovators with a fierce sense of ambition handle the criticisms and objections that inevitably come their way and make sure that confidence does not turn into bombast?

Demonstrate the ability to build and defend a coherent and justifiable normative evaluation of the competing/complementary perspectives.

Political Theory

Critical Analysis Paper

Instructions: In roughly 2000-2200 words, or, 8pgs double-spaced 12pt font (note: there will be
penalties for infringing on the stated length requirements) undertake a comparative critical
analysis of a key political concept, topic or theme studied in this course. You should begin by
choosing an idea, concept or issue addressed by two separate thinkers.
Your first task in the paper is to reconstruct the relevant arguments/concept you have chosen
to analyze/compare in the paper. Having reconstructed the arguments/concepts, you paper
should then build toward an evaluation as to what position/argument (or what aspects of
position/argument) is preferable, taking care to justify your stance (i.e. to reflect on the
assumptions/grounds of your evaluation and to provide reasons to justify them). Your primary
tasks in the essay are to:

1) Demonstrate that you understand the concepts of the thinkers you are analyzing; reconstruct the chain of reasoning at work in a text;

2) Demonstrate the ability to analyze features of arguments/positions; establish a comparative analysis that clearly identifies why/how the thinkers differ/overlap on a\similar theme/issue

3) Demonstrate the ability to build and defend a coherent and justifiable normative evaluation of the competing/complementary perspectives

Discuss and contrast liberal, Marxist and nationalist perspectives on the ideal form of government.Which of these do you prefer and why?

POLITICAL THEORY, ideal form of government.

As an essay of 1500 words, answer to the question: ‘Discuss and contrast liberal, Marxist and nationalist perspectives on the ideal form of government.Which of these do you prefer and why? ‘

Structure it well, make it make sense, do not be very descriptive and be more analytic. Compare, and give examples if necessary and of course names of key thinkers like Mill, Marx, etc…

Write it from a right-wing perspective, quite liberal at the same time, so for sure not preferring the Marxist view.

DO NOT COPY FROM SOURCES, DO NOT PLAGIARISE , use own words all the time.

Add a bibliography in the end (Harvard style)