Describe the program or policy that is to be evaluated, including its purpose, stakeholders, history, and outcomes, which will be part of your introduction and description you completed in Week Two.

Present your research question and introduction from the assignment you completed in Week Two.

Literature Review
From the assignment you completed in Week Four, compose a literature review comprised of previous scholarly material and research results relevant to your selected topic.

Program or Policy Description

Describe the program or policy that is to be evaluated, including its purpose, stakeholders, history, and outcomes, which will be part of your introduction and description you completed in Week Two.
Explain the impact of relevant issues, including potential political, social, economic, and/or cultural constraints associated with this program or policy.
Proposal Narrative

Present your measures and methodology from the assignment you completed in Week Three.
Critique the design of the program or policy by describing the methodology, including the data to be collected, the means of collection, and how the data will be used.
Identify a proposed budget and projected schedule for the evaluation.
Summary
Summarize the expected outcomes, the questions to be answered, and the expected results that would indicate success of the program or policy.

Explain the impact of political and ethical issues associated with program evaluation. Explain the process involved in formulating and developing a quality evaluation question.

What Makes A Good Evaluation Question

Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, be certain to have read all the required resources for this week.

In your initial post, briefly describe the components of a good evaluation question. Explain the impact of political and ethical issues associated with program evaluation. Explain the process involved in formulating and developing a quality evaluation question. Identify pertinent components that good evaluation questions should contain. In addition, identify an appropriate topic for the Final Paper, and formulate a preliminary research evaluation question relevant to that assignment.

Identify who is subject to which employment laws and understand the implication of each of these laws for both the employer and employee.

The Regulation of Employment
Triangle Images/Getty Images
Learning Objectives
After completing this chapter, you should be able to:
Describe the balance between the freedom to contract and the current regulatory
environment for employment.
Identify who is subject to which employment laws and understand the implication of each of these laws for both the employer and employee.
Delineate the risks to the employer caused by employee misclassification.
Explain the difference between an employee and an independent contractor and the tests
that help us in that determination.
Articulate the various ways in which the concept “employer” is defined by the various
employment–related regulations.
 Describe the permissible parameters of non–compete agreements

Explain the post–Civil War statutes, including what each is and what it does.  Discuss what management can do to comply with Title VII.

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division
Learning Objectives
After completing this chapter, you should be able to:
 Explain the history leading up to passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Give examples of the ways that certain groups of people were treated -differently before
passage of the Civil Rights Act.
Discuss what is prohibited by Title VII.
Recognize who is covered by Title VII and who is not.
State how a Title VII claim is filed and proceeds through the -administrative process.
Determine if a Title VII claimant is able to proceed after receiving a -no–reasonable–cause
finding.
Distinguish between the various types of alternative dispute resolution used by the EEOC.
Explain the post–Civil War statutes, including what each is and what it does.
 Discuss what management can do to comply with Title VII.

Provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice. For full credit, you must use the material from the textbook by using APA citation with page numbers when responding to the questions.

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice. For full credit, you must use the material from the textbook by using APA citation with page numbers when responding to the questions.
Utilize the case format below.
Read and understand the case. Show your analysis and reasoning and make it clear you understand the material. Be sure to incorporate the concepts of the chapter we are studying to show your reasoning. For each of the cases you select, dedicate one subheading to each of the following outline topics.

Discuss common gender realities which clash with common basis for illegal workplace determinations.

Discuss common gender realities

Discuss common gender realities which clash with common basis for illegal workplace determinations.

Response in two Paragraphs at least two to three paragraph of 6 sentences each:

Response to the following post in one Paragraph L.H :

Discuss common gender realities which clash with common basis for illegal workplace determinations.
Professor/Class,

Here are just a few of what gender realities look like in the workplace from the reading in Chapter 8.
• Women are better suited to repetitive, fine-motor-skill tasks.
• Women are too unstable to handle jobs with a great deal of responsibility or high pressure.
• Men make better employees because they are more aggressive.
• Men do not do well at jobs requiring nurturing skills such as day care, nursing, elder care, and the like.
• When women are criticized at work, they will become angry or cry.

Would the plaintiff have to file by the preceding Friday? Would the law excuse the weekend and consider a Monday filing to be timely, even though that would technically be the 366th day?

Donald J. Trump v. Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University

In the IRAC method of legal analysis, the “issue” is simply a legal question that must be answered. An issue arises when the facts of a case present a legal ambiguity that must be resolved in a case, and legal researchers typically resolve the issue by consulting legal precedent.

For example, suppose the law required that a lawsuit had to be filed within one year of an allegedly negligent act. If the 365th day falls on a Sunday, then the issue would be whether or not the law counts weekends as part of its computation of the one-year time limit.

Would the plaintiff have to file by the preceding Friday? Would the law excuse the weekend and consider a Monday filing to be timely, even though that would technically be the 366th day? In order to answer the legal question, one would move to the next letter in the IRAC acronym: “R” – which stands for Rule.

What is at stake and are there limits or risks for the region? Do this support instruments contribute to Western Balkans interests?

Cybersecurity in the Western Balkans- EU’s approach to cyber diplomacy in the region

This  is intended to analyse cybersecurity policy gaps in the Balkans and possible cooperation opportunities with the European Union. As cyber domain knows no borders, several security challenges have the urge to be treated with consideration in the development countries, which lack capacities and resources to enhance initiatives on their own.
Therefore, it will be outlined that to achieve a global strengthening of the international policy environment there must be taken several strategic steps by each state.
The study will contain a short overview of the existing security measures in this region and in Europe in order to emphasize what mechanisms are still lacking and need further attention.
It will start by depicting a general national legislative overview of the state of play in the Western Balkan countries with regards to the EU acquis and to the relevant international law in effect.

On the other side, it will be examined what are the conditions of the EU’s cyber diplomacy toolbox and its strategical challenges. The complexity of cyberspace and WB’s proximity to Europe actually might provide an excellent background for future cooperation. But what is at stake and are there limits or risks for the region? Do this support instruments contribute to Western Balkans interests?