Provide a proposal for a research project, explain why the topic you have chosen is important, what is the core literature, and how you would structure and write such a dissertation in an organized and coherent manner.

Financial Crimes in Electronic Payment: An Analysis of the EU and Saudi regulatory approach’

Provide a proposal for a research project, explain why the topic you have chosen is important, what is the core literature, and how you would structure and write such a statement in an organized and coherent manner.

Are considerations like the nature of the relationship relevant? If not this specific consideration, then are there any others? Should they be relevant or not in a family home? In other contexts? Do they promote autonomy?

Trusts of the family home

“Considerations such as the nature of the relationship between two parties are not relevant to the question of their proprietary holdings, nor should they be, especially when it comes to the family home. Such considerations don’t promote autonomy. Moreover, the intervention of Courts in such considerations is institutionally misguided.”

To what extent do you agree?

Also please endeavour to answer all parts of the question. E.g. Are considerations like the nature of the relationship relevant? If not this specific consideration, then are there any others? Should they be relevant or not in a family home? In other contexts? Do they promote autonomy? Do they promote anything else that makes them important to consider? Is the intervention of the courts misguided?

Does not have to be answered like this, that is up to you but all layers should be answered.
Critical analysis is a must! Give your own opinion/thoughts on academics ideas.

Give headings and subheadings for each new part of the essay being discussed. Also, decide what will be discussed and what side you land on in the introduction.

 

Explain whether you, on behalf of your organization, are for or against this policy. Identify and explain which government agency has promulgated the rules and regulations of the policy issue you identified.

In your position paper, you must include the following:

A description of the local, state, or federal administrative agency you selected for your Final Project .
A description of the environmental, human rights, or public safety issue you selected.
A description of a major policy related to the issue you selected around which you will create your position.

Explain whether you, on behalf of your organization, are for or against this policy. Identify and explain which government agency has promulgated the rules and regulations of the policy issue you identified.
An explanation of how international laws, treaties, regulations, and administrative laws will affect your position.
An explanation of how a presidential transition or leadership transition did, or may, impact your position regarding this policy.

Show the connections between your definitions, assumptions, functions, and dysfunctions of the legal system and how these guide the behavior of members of society.

In a well-written informative essay of roughly 4 pages , provide an evaluation of the U.S. legal system today. In your essay you must: (1) incorporate at least two of the four major assumptions of law; (2) describe at least two functions and two dysfunctions of law; and (3) incorporate at least two different definitions of law. Your assessment should explain how each of the selected topics relate to one another:

Show the connections between your definitions, assumptions, functions, and dysfunctions of the legal system and how these guide the behavior of members of society.

This project will require outside research. You will use the chapter reading and at least two outside authoritative sources to help support your analysis. You may consult the Library, the internet, the textbook, other course material, and any other outside resources in supporting your task, using proper citations in either Bluebook or APA style. In addition to fulfilling the specifics of the assignment, a successful paper must also meet the following criteria:

What are the legal and contractual features of collaborative procurement and what legal and contractual obstacles can affect the collaborative procurement of UK projects?

Write 4000 Words on the given question . use Academic referencing to Identify the Legal and Contractual features of Collaborative Procurement in Construction

‘What are the legal and contractual features of collaborative procurement and what legal and contractual obstacles can affect the collaborative procurement of UK projects? What different legal and contractual obstacles affect the collaborative procurement of international projects compared to UK projects?’

Evaluate HMH’s alternatives from both an ethical and a legal perspective, including consideration of the federal HIPAA privacy rule. Also, decide whether the current law should be clarified or amended. Be prepared to explain the reasons for your conclusions.

In the three months since the first newspaper report about Long’s allegations, HMH has experienced a severe drop in visits by patients who have coverage through commercial health insurance or employer-based health plans. It appears that a substantial majority of those insured patients have chosen to receive care at the for-profit hospital in the county or at hospitals in other counties. HMH relies heavily on those insured patients to subsidize its indigent care and its losses on Medicaid patients. HMH has determined that it will be unable to pay all of its operating expenses if this situation continues for another six months.

The CEO of HMH attempted to communicate with Long in an effort to resolve the matter or, at least, obtain his consent to allow HMH to release his medical record to the local newspaper. The CEO even suggested that it might be possible to make a financial settlement with him, in exchange for a neutral press release that would be acceptable to both sides. However, Long refused to discuss any type of settlement and refused to consent to the release of his medical record.

Finally, board member “D” argued that ethical considerations require disclosing Long’s history of delusional episodes, because the potential harm to Long from his loss of privacy is vastly outweighed by the greater good of preserving the community’s safety-net hospital, which is at serious risk of insolvency.

Evaluate HMH’s alternatives from both an ethical and a legal perspective, including consideration of the federal HIPAA privacy rule. Also, decide whether the current law should be clarified or amended. Be prepared to explain the reasons for your conclusions.

Under these facts, what claims could Dr. Stuart assert against the other physicians, and what defenses could the other physicians raise? Be sure to discuss the elements of each potential claim and defense, as well as your evaluation of the likelihood of success on each claim or defense.

One month later, Dr. Jackson and another member of General’s OB/ GYN staff, Dr. George Alexander, met with a representative of Happy Family Health Plan. The administrator of General was also present at that meeting. The two physicians told the representative of Happy Family that they were concerned about the unsafe practices at the Center’s new healthcare program. The two physicians also stated that they hoped Happy Family would not accept the Center and Dr. Stuart as participating providers with eligibility to receive payment from Happy Family. In fact, the doctors said that they were so concerned about the Center’s unsafe practices that if Happy Family agreed to pay the Center and Dr. Stuart for services rendered to Happy Family patients, all of the other members of the OB/GYN staff at General would feel ethically bound to stop treating Happy Family patients.

The representative of Happy Family asked the two physicians whether all of the other OB/GYN physicians at General felt the same way. The doctors responded that all of the physicians at the meeting on November 15 had agreed that Dr. Jackson and Dr. Alexander should speak to Happy Family on their behalf. In addition, the administrator of General stated that General might have to reevaluate its contractual arrangement with Happy Family the next time that General’s provider contract with Happy Family came up for renewal. One week later, Happy Family wrote to the Center and Dr. Stuart to state that Happy Family would not accept them as participating providers and therefore would not pay the Center or Dr. Stuart for services rendered to Happy Family patients.

Under these facts, what claims could Dr. Stuart assert against the other physicians, and what defenses could the other physicians raise? Be sure to discuss the elements of each potential claim and defense, as well as your evaluation of the likelihood of success on each claim or defense.

Was the state agency correct in finding that County’s application was nonconforming with the criterion at § 1715(1)? Why or why not?

In its decision to deny the County application, the state agency found that County’s application was nonconforming with the agency’s regulatory criterion at § 1715(5). Specifically, the agency found that Doc-tor’s existing open-heart surgery program had not operated at a level of at least 80 percent of capacity during the 12-month period reflected in its most recently filed licensure form.

Questions
1. Was the state agency correct in finding that County’s application was nonconforming with the criterion at § 1715(1)? Why or why not?

2. Was the state agency correct in finding that County’s application was nonconforming with the criterion at § 1715(5)? Why or why not?

3. On what basis could County argue that it is conforming with the criterion at § 1715(3)? On what basis could the state agency argue that County’s application is nonconforming with that criterion? In your opinion, which side has the more persuasive argument? Why?

4. If County’s application is not conforming with all of the current regulations, what could it do in an effort to develop an open-heart surgery program?

Is it possible to break up the writing proces, to get feedback from the supervisor in between?

– And in the next phase of actual paper writing, is it possible to break up the writing proces, to get feedback from the supervisor in between?

Master  International and European Law
To complete the Master’s Program International and European Law, students of both tracks must write an individual LLM  in International or European Law.

The Master’s thesis must fulfil the following requirements:

For all students in the track International Law and Global Governance, thesis supervision is structured via the compulsory course called Research Design and Methods for Postnational Lawyers .