How do legal risks,medical malpractice claims, tort reform, and defensive medicine impact the relationship between healthcare providers and patients?

Assigned Case based on America Healthcare Law and Policy

Healthcare stakeholders disagree about the impact of legal risks, medical malpractice claims, tort reform, and defensive medicine on the cost of care and the cost of health insurance in the United States, as well as the importance of such impact.

How do legal risks,medical malpractice claims, tort reform, and defensive medicine impact the relationship between healthcare providers and patients?How should they impact the relationship?Make three suggestions to improve existing healthcare policy based on your analysis of impacts on the provider-patient relationship.

Identify the potential key stakeholders and propose a plan for engagement.

Assigned Case (based on American healthcare law and policy)
Healthcare reform can take place at multiple levels of government and in the context of professional regulation. Pretend that you are a policy aide to a governor. How would you engage with key stakeholders to determine which reform efforts (in the areas of payment reform, medical malpractice, and patient access to preventive services) should be prioritized in your state? Clearly identify the potential key stakeholders and propose a plan for engagement.

Discuss the multitude of legal viewpoints,ethical issues,and issues of interprofessionalism.

This week, you will continue the work on your paper. You will focus on completing a full-length rough draft ready for final critique by the instructor.

Please remember the following: Your final paper will discuss the multitude of legal viewpoints,ethical issues,and issues of interprofessionalism related to your topic. You will be required to discuss how values, ethics, and sense of interprofessionalism may shape how the topic is interpreted, analyzed, and communicated in legal and ethical terms. Your final paper should be completed using proper APA format, Times New Roman, 12-point font, with 1-inch margins, should be 6–8 typewritten pages, and should use at least five peer-reviewed sources.

Consider how delegating a task could contribute to the workforce development of the person to whom the task is delegated.

When is delegation appropriate

For your initial post to this discussion, describe when a public health task can or should be delegated. Consider how delegating a task could contribute to the workforce development of the person to whom the task is delegated. This may provide an opportunity for the person to stretch, keeping in mind that you do not want to delegate a task that goes beyond what the person can handle.

Include one academic reference in your post. Use current APA style and formatting appropriate to the type of reference you provide. Remember to follow the discussion guidelines in the FEM.

Explain what we mean by scope creep and describe how it could affect the project of workforce development.

Project Management

Project management is a practice meant to keep work moving toward completion. Good project management can help keep the tasks of workforce development on track.

For this discussion, adhere to the FEM guidelines as you address the following:

Examine ways to make sure workforce development stays on track.
Explain what we mean by scope creep and describe how it could affect the project of workforce development.
Describe some of the risks that emerge if a project does not complete on time.
Analyze some strategies you could use to get team members on task with their own skills development.
Include one academic reference in your post. Use current APA style and formatting appropriate to the type of reference you provide.

What is the role of cytokines in the infectious disease process?

6 PH 560 Discussion

Cytokines are a growing focus in immunology research. Discuss cytokines by answering the following questions, using your textbook and peer-reviewed journal articles to support your statements.

What is a cytokine, and how is it produced?
What is the role of cytokines in the infectious disease process?
What aspect of cytokines do you find especially challenging or do not understand? Pose a question that your instructor or classmates can answer for you.
Respond to at least two (2) of your classmates’ or your instructor’s posts.

Your responses should include elements such as follow-up questions, a further exploration of topics from the initial post, or requests for further clarification or explanation on some points made.

Define probiotics then compare and contrast the four probiotics.How are they alike?How are they different?

6 PH 560

This week, you will compare and contrast four probiotics.

Review this probiotics table which provides a breakdown between four different popular probiotics. Review the literature and research these probiotics further.

Write a 2- to 3-page paper in which you:

Define probiotics.
Compare and contrast the four probiotics. How are they alike? How are they different?
In your opinion, which of the four is most “valuable” and which is the least? Explain your reasoning.
Your paper must be 2–3 pages in length. Include evidence or information from at least one credible external source and follow APA style for formatting and citation.

Analyze the facts of the hypothetical situation against the right or responsibility to explain how there was a violation.

6 HA 500

This week, you learned that employees have a multitude of rights and responsibilities, much like a patient. Employees have to feel safe in their environment in order to provide the best possible care to patients. Thus, federal, state, and local laws provide rules for the treatment of employees as well as the expectations of employees.

For this discussion prompt, use the St. Martha’s General Hospital Scenario. After reviewing a scenario and reading about employee rights and responsibilities, discuss an employee right or responsibility that may have been violated at St. Martha’s General Hospital. Then, analyze the facts of the hypothetical situation against the right or responsibility to explain how there was a violation.