Explain the role stakeholders should have in shaping these policy choices.

Review Box 11-1 (“Vignette”) in Chapter 11 of your textbook (see attached document with box 11-1 and textbook login info). Develop a strategy to help the governor evaluate whether to expand Medicaid and create a state run insurance exchange.

Be sure to advise the governor on how to engage with key stakeholders. Explain the role stakeholders should have in shaping these policy choices. Your strategy should suggest an approach to resolving value conflicts among stakeholders.

How have the organizations you are familiar with demonstrated core measures?

Explore the relationship between demonstrating successful achievement of the core measures in quality patient care and reimbursement.What is the future of organizations and providers who do not focus on core measures?

How have the organizations you are familiar with demonstrated core measures?

How do these results get reported?

Do you believe that achievement of core measures truly equates to value?

Do patients and consumers understand what core measures are?

Explain how the completion criteria will determine the success of the goal of converting paper to Automated EMR.

Project Scope

For this assignment, you will develop the scope document for your professional project. You will use this scope document for all subsequent assignments.

Changes in scope impact the timeline and budget of a project, so it is essential that the proper parameters are identified for the scope of a project. In 750-1,000 words, develop a scope document that outlines these parameters and provides stakeholders with a clear understanding of what is “in scope” and “out of scope” for your project.

Include the following:

INCLUDE: INTRODUCTION

1 .Define the scope of converting paper to automated EMR for the informatics project. Include project boundaries, limitations and constraints, affected users, timeline, budget, and specific resources required for the project.

2. Develop parameters for converting paper to automated EMR. Provide rationale or evidence to justify the parameters.

3. Explain what is “in scope” and “out of scope” for converting paper to automated EMR.

4. Describe the high-level deliverables expected from converting paper to automated EMR. Provide support to justify these as high-level deliverables.

5. Develop completion criteria to measure whether project deliverables are acceptable.

6. Explain how the completion criteria will determine the success of the goal of converting paper to Automated EMR.

Be sure to include budget and scheduling requirements.

What aspects of the care or service were you pleased with?What could have been done better?

Instructions

Think about your most recent healthcare encounter. What aspects of the care or service were you pleased with?What could have been done better? Read the article “My Right Knee” by D. M. Berwick in Annals of Internal Medicine 142 (2): 121–25

In a 2 to 3 page essay (APA format) write about your experience. Explain which of Dr. Berwick’s quality requirements were met and which were not during your recent healthcare encounter. Which aspects were you pleased with, and what could have been done better?Be as specific as possible in answering these questions.

Discuss how a humanistic management theory can be utilized to improve the employee relations within this scenario.

Leader Plan Assignment:

Assess a variety of management theories to identify solutions for improving the management of operations within an HIM department

Assess a variety of leadership theories to identify solutions for improving the management of operations within an HIM department

Create a manager or leader improvement plan, given a template

Instructions

Review the case study from chapter 1 of your textbook and answer the questions for the scenario by creating a manager or leader improvement plan. Use the template in figure 1.11 to complete this manager or leader plan.

Deliverables

Create a one-year manager or leader plan for Jamie to utilize as she improves the deficiencies as noted within her workgroup. The plan should include three improvement goals for each area that reports to her and should incorporate improvements for the items that are noted as deficiencies for the operations workgroup. The improvement goals should include support from a variety of management and leadership theories outlined within the chapter. The goals should also include realistic time frames for completion.

Components of the plan should include the following:

One example of how a scientific management theory can be utilized to improve the management of ROI turnaround times within this scenario.

One example of how a humanistic management theory can be utilized to improve the employee relations within this scenario.

Identification of a leadership theory that Jamie should embrace in order to effectively lead her team.

Evaluate the legal risks and malpractice issues you identified in Milestone Two,being sure to analyze how conflicting values may impact potential legalrisks.

Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric

For your third milestone in your final project,you will develop an outline of the areas of analysis for your chosen issue. This will serve as a template for Milestone Four, where you will provide your in–depth analysis of each component.

Your outline for Milestone Three should include the following elements to be analyzed in the next milestone:

Analyze the needs and interests of the key stakeholders you identified. Be sure to provide specific examples.

Apply current healthcare laws, policies, and financing practices to the issue. Be sure to highlight any potential financial ramifications associated with theissue.

Explain why stakeholder value conflicts may exist in this environment. Be sure to justify your reasoning.

Evaluate the legal risks and malpractice issues you identified in Milestone Two,being sure to analyze how conflicting values may impact potential legalrisks.

What is the impact of meeting or not meeting the national quality benchmarks on value-based reimbursement?

What is the impact of meeting or not meeting the national quality benchmarks on value-based reimbursement?

See rubric and use the links and resources given.

Textbook: Nash, D. B., Joshi, M. S., Ransom, E. R., & Ransom, S. B. (Eds.). (2019). The healthcare quality book: Vision, strategy, and tools (4thed.).Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press. ISBN: 978-1-64055-054-4