What assumptions do you see between the lines, that the Notes not directly conveyed, but that you suspect lurk in the shadows of the material, whether for good or bad.

Psychopharmacology notes w5

Read the attached notes and answer the following prompt:Reminder that here you will write as if to a high school sophomore, i.e., they understand large words and important ideas, but they have not yet been to grad school or even college. As such, you are explaining things to them in basic ways that they would easily understand (this will also obviously mean that you will need to digest the ideas and not just spit them out from the Notes,which as you know we avoid having students do at Meridian):

What are the key things -the concepts, otherwise thought of as “nouns” in this week’s Notes? (e.g., psychotropic medications would be one such thing). Mention five such things.

What are either the faculty’s – or better yet, the field’s – principles, as faculty has conveyed in the Notes (e.g. psychotropic medications can be a good thing and they can be a very bad thing – they are a mixed bag). Mention five such principles.

What assumptions do you see between the lines, that the Notes not directly conveyed, but that you suspect lurk in the shadows of the material, whether for good or bad (shadows are not necessarily bad). Mention five such between-the-line possible assumptions.

What do you not understand, whether due to lack of time on your part, or because it feels like it’s a mountain of material that you’ve only gotten a through just a bit thus far, or because it feels too complex? Mention at least three things that you don’t, as yet, understand.

Explain how the organization can develop these strategies and the risk, and how the organization can earn about-average returns using each strategy.

Zoom Corporation

Am attaching a document that have already started working on.Need to fill in those section answering the questions below.Use the information have already provided and add on to that with the information you find. Also make sure to add the references as well

Define a target market the organization should focus on
Present the needs of those target customers that the organization can satisfy.

From the five types of business-level strategies, select two strategies that could address those needs in a different way and how the organization will satisfy those needs with each strategy.

Explain how the organization can develop these strategies and the risk, and how the organization can earn about-average returns using each strategy

Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of health promotion models including behaviour change theory.

Principles and Perspectives of Health Promotion

The assessment strategy requires students to:
Develop and create a poster that demonstrates a clear health promotion message to a defined target population of the students choice.
Undertake a 40 minute poster presentation (30 minutes presentation and 10 minutes question and answer session).

The 30 minute critical verbal presentation around the health promotion poster should :

Include an introduction – to include a brief overview of the structure and contents of the presentation.
Provide a sound underpinning rationale for choice of topic area and target audience, supported by relevant epidemiological and demographic data.  Justify choices made with application to local, national and global health promotion policies and interventions.
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the process of devising a poster: Such as the use of font, graphics and colours.
Give clear justification for the style, design and format of the poster.
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of health promotion models including behaviour change theory.
Critically discuss the strengths and weaknesses of posters as a health promotion tool, with application to your poster.
Critically explore where the poster would be displayed with rationale for choice of locations.
Identify and analyse any ethical principles which apply to the health promotion poster and target audience.
Identify how the impact of the poster on the target audience could be evaluated.
Critically evaluate other media interventions which could be utilised alongside the poster to promote the health of the target audience.
Provide an overall summary to conclude.

Critically explore the strengths and weaknesses of posters as a health promotion tool.

HIV in Nyacheki Village Kenya

Hi have seen the poster. We have not got there yet. Size of poster is ok. There are issues of color and images. the poster neeed to be in colors that attract. You have unattractive colors. The images are not as near real, they look like shadows. I have also rewritten the order in which the present information on poster. First 2 lines introduce statistics. I have taken out some information. Please use the attached reworked information. I have also attached an example of a poster for Malaria that has passed the test before. Use it as guide for background color, and presentation. Hopefully we can get it right this time.

Have looked at what you have developed. This is not a poster but you have done a leaflet. A poster is an information poster to hang in clinics, market place, and churches hall, and office to;
Raise awareness about HIV
Educate people about seriousness through showing % deaths
Help Change life styles through Health sex relationships
Information about the youth as vulnerable group
Encourage testing
Signpost to contact

The information i sent you in word is the only one to go on the poster. We do not need logos from Kenya or WHO. Images communicate but you have put it in the background. If you see the Malaria one i sent you. The mosquito stands alone. It is not hidden in the background. Read the assignment brief well please. We are running out of time.

Have seen the poster. This one is ok now in design and information input and presentation. The picture is ok. The only issue is the writing is not mostly black and small therefore would not attract attention. Imagine the poster on a clinic wall and someone is reading from 2 meter away. It may not be legible. So try enlarge size, and change to brighter colors someone can see from a distance.Otherwise we are almost there now.

You have made the write up too big and it has lost its meaning. The position of writing has moved. Please mirror the Malaria poster i gave you. Do not do Italics. The writing at the bottom should be smaller than the top. Make it flow. Big writing start at the top and reduce as you down. I have a feeling you only just increased the font. Please design.
On the Critical analysis paper please ensure we have the following and ensure the poster is aligned.
Critically explore the strengths and weaknesses of posters as a health promotion tool.
Critically analyse the style and contents of your poster:

You may wish to consider some of the following points (these are only ideas and you are free to discuss other issues):
Why did you go for shock tactics and choose to use attention grabbing images, alternatively, why did you utilise statistics on morbidity and mortality rates when promoting the prevention of an illness. You need to analyse the structure of your poster; why have you set it out in a certain way, how does this help to get the message across to the target audience? Could your health promotion poster be interpreted diffe.

We have been revising the poster only. Now we are revising the Critical analysis for the poster.

It is part of the essay. Remember also in the essay we analysis how and why we chose the type of essay we have done. What criteria we used, how it fits into the Health promotion models.How we have considered where it will be displayed. Who it targets and what impact it is likely to have and how this is measured.

The poster is what the paper analyses. If there do not tarry then the paper you have done is wrong. Assignment was developed a poster then a critical analysis of the poster.

Determine effective investment of resources in health information technology for healthcare institutions based on the needs of the healthcare institution.

HIM 500 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric
Overview Practitioners in health information management and healthcare informatics are expected to be keenly aware of new and upcoming technologies that might benefit their organization. This becomes more complex as these individuals must also consider the impact that those technologies might have on the practice of medicine at their institution. When faced with new technologies, leaders in health information management must evaluate the state of the organization and make an informed decision that will affect the organization as a whole. This means addressing not just the needs of the health information management team,but the needs of all roles within the institution, while also addressing any issues of compliance the organization might be facing. For your final project in this course, you will imagine you have been hired as a contractor for a small medical facility to consult on the selection of a new technology. Their organization has been struggling, so you must first speak to the state of the organization and then offer an informed recommendation as to which of the technologies would suit the organization best. The project is divided into three milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Three, Five and Seven. The final product will
be submitted in Module Nine.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
Determine standard technology systems and their uses in modern healthcare institutions through analysis of current and historical technology use in health information management and healthcare informatics
Analyze the interrelationship between various professional roles within healthcare institutions and their use of technology systems for informing recommendations regarding health information technology systems
Determine the potential impact of violating health regulations and laws regarding health information technology systems on healthcare organizations
Develop health information technology recommendations for healthcare institutions that are compliant with health regulations and laws and ensure ethical management of health information
Determine effective investment of resources in health information technology for healthcare institutions based on the needs of the healthcare institution

Explain how health care professionals in multiple roles can apply the findings of the studies to improve practice.

Foundations of Evidence-Based Practice in Health Care

Your paper should be 4–6 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
Assignment Grading
The following requirements correspond to the scoring guide criteria, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level descriptions in the scoring guide for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed.
Construct a PICO(T) question (step 1 in the EBP process).
Summarize the PICO(T) components of the health care challenge presented in the following Vila Health scenario and qualitative research study, and write a PICO(T) question:
Vila Health: The Best Evidence for a Health Care Challenge.
Carlfjord, S., Öhrn, A., & Gunnarsson, A. (2018). ⦁ Experiences from ten years of incident reporting in health care: A qualitative study among department managers and coordinators. BMC Health Services Research, 18, 1–9.
Your PICO(T) question will be the basis of your search for additional research evidence.
Implement a search strategy for the best evidence (step 2 in the EBP process).
Search for one quantitative study that supports the Chief Nursing Officer’s suggested intervention or an alternative intervention.
Base your search strategy on your PICO(T) question and on appropriate study methods and designs with the best evidence.
Describe your search strategy, and explain how you determined it would lead to finding the best evidence for your PICO(T) question.
What databases did you search?
What search terms were most effective?
What’s your rationale for concluding that you’ve found the best evidence?
Identify and summarize the study you found for this purpose.
Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence in both the qualitative and quantitative research studies, in relation to the health care challenge (step 3 in the EBP process).
Conduct a rapid critical appraisal of the study provided by the CNO and the quantitative study you found in your search.
Consider the research design and methods in relation to the evidence presented when you choose an appropriate critical appraisal tool and complete the appraisal for each study.
Interpret the evidence and its implications, in relation to the health care challenge (step 4 in the EBP process).
Synthesize all of the evidence, including research evidence, organizational evidence/data, and staff perceptions.

Explain why the quantitative study you found and (or) the CNO’s study contains the best evidence for your PICO(T) question.
Recommend a strategy to implement the evidence-based intervention in your PICO(T) question (also part of step 4 in the EBP process).
Support your recommended strategy with a synthesis of the evidence presented in the studies and (or) additional relevant and timely resources.
Explain how health care professionals in multiple roles can apply the findings of the studies to improve practice.
Reflect on how you and other health care professionals can improve practice, based on your interpretation of the implications of these studies.
This part of your paper extends beyond the steps of the EBP process to address how interprofessional collaboration and communication can lead to improvements in health care.
Synthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings.
Note: Your instructor will use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.
Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your paper to your ePortfolio.
SCORING GUIDE
Your Work will be evaluated using this criteria.
VIEW SCORING GUIDE
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assignment criteria:
Competency 1: Apply the steps of the evidence-based practice process to a health care challenge.
Construct a PICO(T) question.
Competency 2: Differentiate among qualitative, quantitative, and mixed research design methods, and evidence for health care and public health.
Implement a search strategy for the best evidence.
Competency 3: Evaluate the design, methods, results, and overall quality of qualitative research methods and results, within the context of evidence-based practice.
Recommend a strategy to implement an evidence-based intervention in a PICO(T) question.
Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the evidence provided in a study, in relation to a health care challenge.
Competency 4: Interpret the practical significance of quantitative and qualitative health care data analyses and results, using the evidence-based practice process.
Interpret evidence and its implications, in relation to a health care challenge.
Explain how health care professionals in multiple roles can apply the findings of a research study to improve practice.
Competency 5: Produce original, written work, in compliance with Capella’s writing standards, that is a creative synthesis of information from credible sources.
Synthesize multiple sources into key themes or findings.

Discuss the issues facing a disadvantaged group in the UK.Outline the impact these issues have on health and wellbeing.

Discuss the issues facing a disadvantaged group in the UK.Outline the impact these issues have on health and wellbeing.

Describe any barriers to care and how these may be overcome.As well as Define the role of the third sector in the UK in relation to health and wellbeing.Using examples evaluate the role of the third sector in the UK in relation to the group identified .

Identify clearly which recent children and family policy or practice issues to be discussed.

2500 words essay in Children and families: Policy and Practice module in ( Health and Social Care Management and Policy). Essay topic: An analysis of how theoretical framework of FGM impacts policies and practice in the UK.

Introduction
Identify clearly which recent children and family policy or practice issue (s) to be discussed.
State rational for this and establish a clear position in relation to topic title or question may relate to policy or theory.
Identify the essay structure i . e which theory or partnership issues to be discussed, ensure you include children’s right.

Main body of essay
No headings are required, but order your work logically depending on which theory policy and practice.
Ensure your discussion includes partnership inform policy and/ or practice.
Ensure consistent discussion i.e a critical analysis that covers policy or practice debates.
Identify limitations of both the research and/ or essay.
Use a constructionist perspective to critically discuss the policy and / or practice.

Conclusion
Summarise the key argument(s) and any implications for further research.

 

What different methods are available for treating dentine sensitivity? What is their efficacy?Describe their scientific basis with reference to published work.

This is a United Kingdom dentistry assignment. so, it is mandatory that you assign to a competent Dentist/Doctor.
Assignment Questions:

Write an account of the different jaw reflexes and quote the findings of published research. What are the functions of the different jaw reflexes and what is their clinical significance?

What different methods are available for treating dentine sensitivity? What is their efficacy?Describe their scientific basis with reference to published work.Discuss the different theories of pain perception in pulp and dentine.

Note: You must include diagrams, tables and legends and figures to support your points. And refences must be recent for example some 2015,2016,2020,2021 not more than 8 years.

The assignment states 1950 words in total, however have indicated 1650 words because the 1950 words included references which is an equivalent of 1 page.

Discuss Extracoronal precision attachments for aesthetics and function in RPD design.

Dentistry

This is a United Kingdom dentistry assignment. so, it is mandatory that you assign to a competent Dentist/Doctor.
Assignment Questions:
Discuss Extracoronal precision attachments for aesthetics and function in RPD design.

Note: You must include diagrams, tables and legends and figures to support your points. And refences must be recent for example some 2015,2016 , 2020, 2019.
The assignment states 1950 words in total, however have indicated 1650 words because the 1950 words included references which is an equivalent of 1 page.