Explore the anatomy and physiology of the neurologic system.

Description

Complete the following on the template:

Complete the physical exam:

Diagnostic Result:

Assessment:

Differential Diagnostic:

1-Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)

2-diabetic neuropathy

3-Obesity

4-Myopia

5-

Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.

·Chapter 23, “Neurologic System”

The authors of this chapter explore the anatomy and physiology of the neurologic system. The authors also describe neurological examinations and potential findings.

Sullivan, D. D. (2019). Guide to clinical documentation (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

Chapter 2, “The Comprehensive History and Physical Exam” (“Cranial Nerves and Their Function” and “Grading Reflexes”) (Previously read in Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 5)

Neurologic system week 9 transcript

Compare the ethical issues and informed consent process between 1951 and today. Do you feel it is appropriate to use ethic definitions from today to define ethics/consent for 1951?

1-What are HeLa cells and how were they discovered? Give a full explanation of the source of the HeLa cell.
2-What medical advances have been attributed to the HeLa Cells?
3-Are ethical and moral discussions concerning the use of these HeLa Cells? Completely define those issues that cause these concerns.
4-Compare the ethical issues and informed consent process between 1951 and today. Do you feel it is appropriate to use ethic definitions from today to define ethics/consent for 1951?

Critically discuss the leadership styles that were demonstrated by the crew and other members of the interprofessional team involved.

Choose a scenario from practice where a clinical management decision was made.
This could be an example such as safeguarding, multi-casualty, non-conveyance, fall, minor illness or refusal of treatment etc.
This needs to be written concisely – a short paragraph which discusses the scenario and tells the marker the important points. Avoid any descriptive writing as this will waste words from the word count and will not improve your grade.

Choose ONE recognised decision-making model such as Hypothetico-deductive or humanistic intuitive to discuss how the scenario was managed.
There are clinical decision-making slides under the ‘week 4’ tab on the Moodle page which explain these two theories and are a good starting point if you are unsure.
You need to define what the chosen decision-making model is and support this with evidence.
How does experience, heuristics and intuition play a part (or do they?). What does the evidence suggest?
Whilst you will be choosing one to focus upon, you could discuss whether certain models tend to be used by experienced/inexperienced clinicians and the positives and negatives associated with these. Remember the critical thinking and writing is expected at level 6.

Critically discuss the leadership styles that were demonstrated by the crew and other members of the interprofessional team involved.
There needs to be critical discussion around the leadership styles that were witnessed. For example, first on scene may have utilised …. but when more experiences clinicians or clinicians with a wider skill set (such as HEMS) arrived, this changed to….
You need to state what the leadership styles you discuss are and support this with evidence.
What are the positives and negatives of these styles, particularly in relation to pre-hospital care? Remember to support all statements and claims with evidence.
There can be some crossover in models/theories and styles. There is a PDF on the Moodle page to help you with this.

Critically discuss the interprofessional and/or teamworking that occurred demonstrating your knowledge of and respect for other professionals involved in the care episode.
Did you liaise or work with HEMS, G.P, Social Services, Community Teams etc?
Why is it important to respect and have knowledge of the other service(s) involved in the care episode?

Diagnose the patients and explain how the diagnosis was made whether there is an alternative diagnosis.

The aim of this case study is to diagnose the patients and explain how the diagnosis was made whether there is an alternative diagnosis.

I am almost certain the disease is scurvy

I have provided everything I was given by my university to help hopefully the task will be well described by additional files but if not please contact me.

My ideal grade for this assignment would be 65-75%

File explanation:

CS3 Tutorial Presentation 2021-2022.pptx is the presentation containing most of the information such as the tests and the clinical history.

CS3 is a template I made to show how the paper should be formatted

Case Study 3 – Practical Method Sheets 2021-2022 is a method sheet we received on the day of the practical, its unlikely you’ll need to use it, but it may come in handy.

Marking Proforma for Case Study 3 – Full Write-up. This is the mark scheme that they will use to mark our work

Does BACP ethical framework promote/ encourage change?

Description

I am focusing on disability (please read criteria sheet) in relation to answering this question. My presenting argument is that counselling does encourage change in the client.

Start with what is societal conformity and a little bit on how this may differ in different cultures. Society expects us to be independent and polite and so on and how disability may be viewed in society.

The client I had could not find a therapist before me who was local to her with wheelchair access. What message does that send the person on a wheelchair trying to access counselling in the society? is counselling encouraging the client to seek therapy? is it inclusive?

In specific cultures, including mine, there is a belief of karma therefore disability may be perceived as their past actions impacting their present state, therefore if a therapist world view is such then how they may be judging the client and this will impact how they show up for the client with all their prejudices and judgments. Therapist’s world views are an important factor, and their self awareness plays a vital role.

Power dynamic between the therapist and client. Carl Rogers says the client is the expert of their experience. He says that the relationship between the client and therapist is of equals. How many factors play into the power dynamic, for instance, therapist in a private practice working from home may not be aware of the client’s background, social status/class, the therapist house, the way they are dressed, the therapy room. The client may come from a more affluent area or maybe coming into an affluent area, will they have judgments? Will the therapist be aware of his/her judgments? Are they equals? Therapist’s awareness is imperative, otherwise it is difficult to facilitate change amongst judgements. Clients don’t have a social class they have an issue that they want to explore and understand in therapy, but am I seeing their socal class! Look at implicit biases that are unconscious.

Look at Carl Rogers view of what brings change in the client (his seven stages of therapeutic change) and what he thinks a therapist needs to offer the client (core conditions).

Does BACP ethical framework promote/ encourage change?

 

Assess the challenge of substance abuse in the workplace in America.

Assess the challenge of substance abuse in the workplace in America
Epidemiology of substance abuse/overdose among workers in America generally and Ohio specifically
Effect of substance use in the workplace – on injuries and fatalities
Economic burden of substance use in the workplace in America and Ohio specifically
Drug testing practices in the workplace and the need for more drug testing
Employer responsibility for drug-free workplace

Who should get the kidney? Why should that candidate receive it over the others?

Option 3: John Doe, Patient One, is in late stage of kidney disease. If he does not receive a new kidney, then he is predicted to die within a week. Doe is 45, single, and has no children. Doctors theorize that Doe damaged his kidney by not following a low-salt diet. Doe inherited one million dollars and is known for giving money to charity. Without a transplant, he will probably be forced to spend all his money searching for a kidney outside of the usual legal channels. Patient Two is Jane Doe (no relation to John). Patient Two is a mother of two children (ages 21 and 24). She is divorced and 55 years old. She developed kidney problems due to eating a high-fat and high-sugar diet. If she does not receive a kidney within one month, doctors believe she will die. Patient Three is an orphan. This orphan lives in a state facility. She was born with a genetic condition that constantly damages her kidney. The only known approach to her condition is to provide her with a kidney transplant every so often. She is 11 and has already undergone two kidney transplants. She will perish in two months if she does not receive another transplant.

All three patients are at the same hospital. The hospital only has one kidney to give out. The orphan’s birth parents were known to be of a religion that is opposed to organ donation. The other patients come from religions that do not oppose organ donation. Who should get the kidney? Why should that candidate receive it over the others? Devise a course of social action and a solution for this case by using the ethics of egoism and then utilitarianism to a key moral conflict involving health care in this case. Appraise the interests of diverse populations (in terms of ethnicity, race, religion, sexual orientation, etc.) and how they relate to the case. Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.