Discuss the risks of electronic health records due to the ease of accessibility and exchange of information .

Argue that electronic health records are vital for patient’s quality of treatment. Discuss how electronic health records can benefit the patient’s treatment in clinical settings. Discuss the risks of electronic health records due to the ease of accessibility and exchange of information .

Look at the ideas of people that that are in support of electronic health records argue that it will allow their patients to get better treatment in a shorter period of time.

Look at the ideas of the people that are in opposition and argue that electronic health records could be compromised and violate HIPAA; hence, exposing the patient’s data to the public.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2793588/
b. https://www.npjournal.org/article/S1555-4155(16)30510-4/fulltext
c. https://bmcmedethics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12910-021-00574-x
d. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/electronic-medical-records.html
e. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554290/

Apply some of the concepts and/or theories we’ve discussed throughout the term. What moral obligations does the business, its leaders, and/or its employees have? Do you have any ethical obligation? How should the ethical challenge be addressed?

William Shaw & Vincent Barry, Moral Issues in Business, 13th edition
This 3–5-page paper is worth 150 total points. See attached rubric.
Go back and reflect on the ethical issue you described in the Case Study you submitted at midterm.
Apply some of the concepts and/or theories we’ve discussed throughout the term. What moral obligations does the business, its leaders, and/or its employees have? Do you have any ethical obligation? How should the ethical challenge be addressed?
Go to pages 79-82 for a practical approach to moral decision-making. USE this approach in your analysis.
Explain why you believe this is the “best” or “right” way to resolve the issue.

How is “good” determined? Explain in one or two sentences what the theory argues is the correct way to determine what is right.

Over the course of thousands of years, various theories have been offered to explain the best way to determine what is ethical. The search for “good” or correct actions and thoughts has provided several strong approaches that are actively used today. While all of the various ethical theories seek to lead one to be ethical, they differ on how this should be accomplished. Each approach has its own strengths and weaknesses. It is important to understand these differences when analyzing ethical decisions from various perspectives.

For this Assignment, you are to add to the chart you constructed in Units 2, 3, and 5 by adding Ross’ prima facie duties and ethics of care. As with the other chart assignments, you will be providing the following for prima facie duties and ethics of care, using your own words:

How is “good” determined? Explain in one or two sentences what the theory argues is the correct way to determine what is right. This is the main argument of the theory in a nutshell.
Name the philosopher or philosophers most closely associated with the theory.
Using phrases or sentences, list at least two major strengths that are specific to that theory.
Using phrases or sentences, list at least two major weaknesses that are specific to that theory.

Describe how your experiences have influenced your thinking and beliefs in each of these areas.

For this week’s assignment, you will write a 4- to 6-page reflective paper. You will utilize the results of the five IAT assessments from the Unit 7 learning activity and analyze your own personal, spiritual, cultural influences, personal biases, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic influences.

In your analysis, you will examine the results of each of those assessments and formulate a plan addressing potential conflicts in those areas. For example, if you are an advocate for pro-life but work with a pregnant mother who is actively using substances and wants an abortion. How would you ethically resolve this conflict between professional and ethical responsibilities and personal beliefs?

Formulate your personal code of conduct when working with diverse clients based upon the NAADAC principles in the areas of spirituality, cultural influences, personal bias, sexual orientation, and socioeconomic status. Describe how your experiences have influenced your thinking and beliefs in each of these areas.

What do you believe is the single most influential force in today’s society that sets the tone for an individual’s personal values and why? Does this force affect Christians positively or negatively?

What do you believe is the single most influential force in today’s society

What do you believe is the single most influential force in today’s society that sets the tone for an individual’s personal values and why? Does this force affect Christians positively or negatively? What is your advice regarding this influential force? Explain and document your reasoning using scholarly and peer reviewed journal articles and/or texts.

Identify the student and the ethical theories that are present demonstrating that you understand how foundational knowledge and current issues influence professional practice.

Case Study – Student and ethical theories

Once you choose your sample student , identify the student and the ethical theories that are present demonstrating that you understand how foundational knowledge and current issues influence professional practice.

Once the ethical challenge is clearly identified/ described , you are asked to connect that challenge to existing theory and research and rationalize and justify your conclusions, making explicit connections to materials discussed/read in class and at least 2 additional peer reviewed research articles , demonstrating that you understand that diversity is a part of families, cultures, and schools, and that complex human issues can interact with the delivery of special education services CEC 6.3.

What new insights do you have? Would you have done things differently in light of what you’ve learned in this course?

Applied Ethics for Advanced Practice Nursing Reflection
This course focused on ethical conflict arising in clinical settings and healthcare systems. You were introduced to philosophical analysis and arguments in the context of clinical practice.

Preventative ethics is the process of anticipating and addressing potential problems before they arise. Many of the issues in healthcare that progress to the dilemma stage  start off as minor communication problems. Think of one occasion from your practice when recognizing or addressing something early on would have diffused an incipient and difficult situation. What new insights do you have? Would you have done things differently in light of what you’ve learned in this course?
Knowledge of theories and principles is necessary for dialogue and collaboration with other professionals in the interest of good care for patients. Do you agree with this statement or not? Defend your answer.
The ANA Code of Ethics with Interpretive Statements “continues to be the foundational moral document of American nursing. It encompasses the profession’s values, obligations, ethical standards, aspirations, and ideals” . How can nurses work both individually and collectively to construct an ethical environment and to remove barriers to its development and maintenance?
Thinking about your current context, what is one concern that has to be addressed? Suggest several appropriate plans of action that may be instituted. Describe your motivation for the action and how you will persevere through adversity.

Present your research summary. Provide an overview of your ‘pro’ and ‘con’ resources  so the reader can understand the big picture of your topic. Are you providing a holistic view of the topic? What limitations and views does your research lack?

Make sure that your topic is well defined and specific. The reader needs to directly understand the issue that you will be addressing.

Build your case, build your argument that you had before you started your research process. What did you believe at the beginning of the semester?

Present your research summary. Provide an overview of your ‘pro’ and ‘con’ resources  so the reader can understand the big picture of your topic. Are you providing a holistic view of the topic? What limitations and views does your research lack?

Confirm in your paper that you are being unbiased and how you know about your research and thinking about the topic. How do you personally manage any basis and inherent assumptions that are inside of your thinking? How could your thinking be wrong? Do you have the ability to find holes in your argument? What are these holes? What are some facts vs. Opinions in your argument? How did you ensure that you were thoughtful and conducted quality thinking?

Tie all this information up in a summary, what does it all mean to you and your topic? Due to thinking your topic through has the process modified your views or approach? Summarize all the information provided.

Expected length of the paper should be a minimum of three pages and not exceed 5 pages properly form

What are some of the findings in the thesis by James Roysdon that are applicable to virtual worlds and games? Have the assertions in his conclusion been proven correct? What additional research is needed?

Select an article by Guinchard, Jackson et al., Behr et al. or Kerbs. How does this article or the research reported in it address the issue of ethics in virtual worlds and games?

• Do you think employers should be able to request your login information for Facebook and other social media sites? If this different from accessing your credit reports, driver’s license records, educational transcripts? Why or why not? Have you started being more careful about what you post on social media sites and who you share it with?
• What are some of the findings in the thesis by James Roysdon that are applicable to virtual worlds and games? Have the assertions in his conclusion been proven correct? What additional research is needed?
What is the major lesson or take-away point from the article? What are the implications of the article’s findings for the future of virtual worlds and games?
• What has the impact of the virtual world/Internet been on professional ethics? What are the major issues in the article by Harshman et al.? How has this affected the legal and health professions? What is another profession that has been similarly affected and what actions have been taken?