Have you ever bought a product that did not work as promised? Have you been disappointed in service at a bank, restaurant, department store, or discount house or from an online merchant?

Positive Business letter

Case Study 6.17
Direct Claim: Righting a Wrong
Adapted from Page 186, so please refer to this assignment sheet as the final word for assignment requirements
Have you ever bought a product that did not work as promised? Have you been disappointed in service at a bank, restaurant, department store, or discount house or from an online merchant? Have you had ideas about how a company or organization could improve its image, service, or product?

Remember that smart companies want to know what their customers think, especially if they could improve their product or services.

Compare Jung and Freud- Where do they ideas both converge and fall away from one another? Provide some defining characteristics of psychoanalysis and how each author exemplifies aspects of the discipline.

Research Essay / Compare and Contrast- You’ll be comparing two of the
authors in the textbook.
Choose ONE of the following suggested topics:
Compare Jung and Freud- Where do they ideas both converge and fall away from one another? Provide some defining characteristics of psychoanalysis and how each author exemplifies aspects of the discipline.
Compare Jefferson with Aristotle – How does each writer view and define the tenants of democracy?
How was this viewed or applied during their time in history? Are their views relevant today?

Provide an alternative perspective to your classmate’s. Explain your rationale and provide evidence from the texts.

Use this source only: https://uerjundergradslit.files.wordpress.com/2020/09/the-norton-anthology-of-american-literature-9th-edition-volumes-a-b

Respond to the classmate post below in 125 words. Support your classmate’s perspective with additional information from the texts.

Support your response with MLA cited examples/quotes from each text. Or, provide an alternative perspective to your classmate’s. Explain your rationale and provide evidence from the texts.

What are the key points of the issue? Why is the issue important? Who is most affected by the issue? What are some of the consequences or possible solutions?

Write an argumentative research essay that addresses a controversy related to the topic you worked with from Unit 3.

What are the key points of the issue? Why is the issue important? Who is most affected by the issue? What are some of the consequences or possible solutions?

You must select one side of the argument and use persuasive writing techniques to make your point.

Consider the rhetoric and research needed to persuade your audience to agree with you. Avoid logical fallacies that would weaken your argument and be sure to incorporate several sources that supplement your thoughts.

Critically discuss and evaluate key management issues in a health professions curriculum, taking account of the specific curriculum approach and/or model, the various stakeholders in the curriculum, and governance issues.

Ensure you address all parts of the question; your answer for each part should reflect the relative weighting for that part of the question. All parts of your answer should be supported with reference to relevant literature.

The word limit for this assignment is 2000 words, excluding any references or appendices\

Critically discuss and evaluate key management issues in a health professions curriculum, taking account of the specific curriculum approach and/or model, the various stakeholders in the curriculum, and governance issues.

Critically evaluate the impact of educational and institutional policies on design and delivery of health professions education.

 

What are possible options? What are the likely consequences of each of these options ?What do you recommend and why?

Analyze an Article
Now that you’ve described the various elements of the framework for analysis, apply all of the above to the problem.

What are possible options?
What are the likely consequences of each of these options ?
Make a recommendation:
Given the various stakeholders, organizational needs, laws, Codes of Ethics, ethical theories and values that we explored in this course, what do you recommend and why? Be sure to include why you did NOT select other options. Your grade will be based on your reasoning.

View this video THEN write an acceptance speech that would be 45-60 seconds in length, if presented orally. Be sure you identify the reason for the award and use the guidelines from the lecture notes to write the speech.

THIS SPEECH WILL NOT BE PRESENTED

View this video THEN write an acceptance speech that would be 45-60 seconds in length, if presented orally. Be sure you identify the reason for the award and use the guidelines from the lecture notes to write the speech. It can be for an award you have actually received or it can be an award that you would aspire to receive. Explain the reason for your choice.

 

Explore the steps of “Analyze Learners and Contexts” and “Write Performance Objectives” in the Dick & Carey model.

Analyzing Learners and Contexts • Writing Performance Objectives
Overview
This week, we will explore the steps of “Analyze Learners and Contexts” and “Write Performance Objectives” in the Dick & Carey model.
First, we will switch our attention to the learners, the contexts in which they will acquire knowledge and skills, and the environment in which they will perform the skills and knowledge. A performance objective needs to have three parts: Condition , Behavior (B), and Criteria (CR). Table 6.2 (p. 121) in the textbook is a good resource when writing performance objectives. Keep in mind, the behaviors  in your performance objectives need to be measurable and achievable. Bloom Taxonomy is a good resource for you to identify action verbs  that can be applied to course assignments.
Objectives
After completing this week, you should be able to:
Examine the three components needed to create a learning objective.
Create learning objectives that are aligned with instructional goals.
Reading and Resources

What are the hinge points for the debate? What questions remain open? Are there any premises on either side that, if incorrect, could weaken one of the views? Are the arguments for either side sound?

Argument For and Against Prostitution

FOLLOWING THESE INSTRUCTIONS
Use the two attached articles on Prostitution only as your resource to develop a critical analysis
DEVELOP A THESIS
5 pages double spaced, Times Roman 12, APA
•Each reading offers a different answer. Nussbaum argues for its acceptability,
while Anderson—responding directly to Nussbaum—draws on the Kantian
concept of autonomy to express reservations about prostitution.
5. The task in your essay is to analyze their academic conversation. Does the
practice of prostitution expresses a threat to the value of human beings
and/or their autonomy?
The first two pages of your paper will introduce these two contrasting views.
In the final three pages of the paper, you will offer your analysis of the debate. The basic task here is to analyze the arguments and identify gaps in the conversation. Looking at the readings, you can ask yourself: What are the hinge points for the debate? What questions remain open? Are there any premises on either side that, if incorrect, could weaken one of the views? Are the arguments for either side sound? What should the reader think about the debate and the reasons given on either side?

What are the steps in the hero’s/heroine’s formation? What in particular advocates certain qualities of mind and action?

The Hero (es)/Heroine(s): Who is presented as hero/heroine in the work? What heroic qualities does he/she possess? Does he/she partially fail? How does he/she develop as a hero/heroine? What are the steps in the hero’s/heroine’s formation? What in particular advocates certain qualities of mind and action? This approach is a way of discussing an author or culture’s conception of goodness. You may, if you wish, deconstruct the image of the hero by showing how the author gives contradictory moral imperatives.
• The Political Implications: What are the political implications of the work? Who in the work is powerful and powerless? Does the text approve of the status quo? Does it advocate or depict revolution? Does the text cry out for change? Does the text leave mixed messages?