What makes this case an ethical dilemma? How might people with different ethical viewpoints perceive this case?

Use the reporter’s questions of who, what, when, where, why, and how. We had a team meeting my manager called and it was a safety meeting about safety due to bodily injury due to the use of postal equipment. She went over safety rules and read over a paper advised of safety lifting requirements and safety operating equipment requirements to ensure safety and she read the requirements of opening an APC and BMC unit she started to open the unit and bend to drop the lid lightly downward towards your feet.

What makes this case an ethical dilemma? How might people with different ethical viewpoints perceive this case? This was unethical because according to the law we companies have to follow OSHA protocol to make sure employees are properly using equipment and not injuring themselves due to a manager just wanting to hit numbers for a bonus and this violated OSHA code this equipment weighed over 2000lbs

What is the nature of Marita’s problem, according to Rose? What about Lucia? How are their problems related to each other, if they are?

Excerpt from the Mike Rose’s Lives On the Boundary:

What is the nature of Marita’s problem, according to Rose? What about Lucia? How are their problems related to each other, if they are?

One interesting difference between this selection and the “Stories from the Front” is that Rose offers descriptions of Marita’s and Lucia’s life situation outside of school. Why is this important to do ? By contrast, McGrath and Spear are completely silent on these sorts of details. Why is that?

Students frequently report finding Rose’s description of Marita and Lucia “sympathetic” while finding McGrath and Spear’s “stories” unsympathetic and demeaning to students. Is that fair? To what do you attribute that response?

If Rose has the problem right, what’s his solution? Does he have one?

How would you describe each category of the reader in your new position? What are the three levels within your colleagues or maybe beyond your colleagues but still professionals? Answer in bullets, one bullet for each audience type.

Why is your audience reading your document

You are writing your memo–an internal company document–to your colleagues.  Our textbook on pages 94-95 discusses three categories of readers.

How would you describe each category of the reader in your new position? What are the three levels within your colleagues or maybe beyond your colleagues but still professionals? Answer in bullets, one bullet for each audience type.

Explain what you know about your audience. Answer in three-bullet form.

Who are your readers

Our textbook offers a series of questions to help you better profile your reader, in this case, the reader of your letter.

Use the assignment description of who your audience is for your letter, and profile your letter reader based on three of the seven areas listed in the textbook on pages 93 and 94. The goal is to think about this hostile audience more deeply, so you can draft a better letter. Select three of the seven and explain what you know about your audience. Answer in three-bullet form.

For instance, if you chose to think about your reader’s job responsibilities you’d start a bullet with that label and explain what you know about the audience’s job responsibilities.
Reply to one reader’s post.

What’s Wrong with my Poster? Explain to your friend what features were needed for a poster and how she could have modified her content to fit the needs of a poster.

Whats wrong with my poster?

TFIRST OPEN THE ATTACHMENT. THEN AFTER STUDYING THIS “Poster” READ THIS POSTER SCENARIO: Your friend earned a C- or 70% on a poster she created. The feedback stated, “a poster is not a letter. Your poster looks like you nearly cut and pasted a letter onto a word document, added some color, and a few banners, and decide you’d created a poster.” You feel bad for your good friend; generally, she does good work, so you decided to take a look. Open the attachment to view the “poster.” Unfortunately, you agree with the grade and analysis. Your friend is correct: no date or signature was included; no letter-like margins are there; it’s error-free and has a scan code on it. But you see problems.

In the discussion What’s Wrong with my Poster? Explain to your friend what features were needed for a poster and how she could have modified her content to fit the needs of a poster. Revisit pages 14 and 15 for a refresher on the qualities of a well-crafted technical document and for our purposes a poster.

But did she have legal connection? Is all she had an emotional connection?Do you think Mackenzie wrongly applied the label of “First Generation” to herself? Explain.

Pinto Article

The label “First Generation” is an emotionally proud label those who are the first in their families to graduate from college. Mackenzie had an emotional connection to that label, too. But did she have legal connection? Is all she had an emotional connection? Consider this excerpt from Pinto’s article:
Do you think Mackenzie wrongly applied the label of “First Generation” to herself? Explain.

Address different radicalization processes/models in the final paper such as Moghaddam’s Staircase, so you only need to research and discuss individual psychological and behavioral factors in this paper.

Instructions
For this midterm assignment, you will write a college level research paper describing the psychological and behavioral factors of individual terrorists .

Address different radicalization processes/models in the final paper such as Moghaddam’s Staircase, so you only need to research and discuss individual psychological and behavioral factors in this paper. Also remember that “psychological” does not mean “psychotic” and we are only addressing those of sound mind who deliberately choose violence for a political purpose, or retribution or to instill fear . State this topic question as presented in your paper.

Describe the setting and the people in the illustration attached below. You may want to open it to a separate screen, or even print it out so that you can look at it. Use complete sentences.

Describe the setting and the people in the illustration attached below. You may want to open it to a separate screen, or even print it out so that you can look at it. Use complete sentences.

Explain what the people are doing and feeling, and why. Then choose one of the groups of people and write a conversation that they could be having. They should discuss future plans, the arrangements they are making for it, the people they will do those things with, and the things that they are going to take with them. Use exclusively vocabulary and grammar from our textbook, and keep it to 100-150 words.

Complete this assignment in a Word document and submit it, as an attachment, to the dropbox before the due date. To type then copy/paste accents, you can use http://spanish.typeit.org/.

Discuss any similarities or differences you have with their interpretations. Did their conclusions help you to see the poem any differently than your first impression of the work?

Remember to provide evidence for your claims in the form of quoted passages from the poem. Quotations, paraphrases, and summaries should be cited according to APA rules of style, including in-text and reference citations. Quoted material should not exceed 25% of the document. Check grammar and spelling before posting.

Example APA Reference:

Frost, R.. The oven bird. Cengage: Gale College Collection.
https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=GCCO&u=gale_9827877&id=GALE|BRGOHW412836445&v=2.1&it=r&sPage=13883791&sid=mindtap-embedView&asid=94ec534a

When you are responding to the posts of your classmates:

Discuss any similarities or differences you have with their interpretations.
Did their conclusions help you to see the poem any differently than your first impression of the work?
Elaborate on any key points.
Your replies to classmates should be at least a paragraph in length and made with an eye to expand, clarify, defend, and/or refine their thoughts. Consider asking questions to further meaningful conversation. Participation must be completed by the end of the week to earn credit.