Analyze the consequences of police corruption on a societal level.Should police officers be prosecuted for these crimes?

Police Corruption in America

Discuss the effects of police corruption in America. Using the various different crimes discussed in class (i.e., kickbacks, corruption of authority, shakedowns), analyze the consequences of police corruption on a societal level. Should police officers be prosecuted for these crimes? Why or why not? Should they be protected by their immunity? Why or why not? How do these crimes interact with white-collar crime in
general?

What recommendations would you make to improve the ability of police and the courts to balance the sometimes conflicting interests of liberty and security?

Term Paper

General Instructions: Respond to the questions below. Single space your answers with 12 point font. Write at least one page per question – you may write more. Use headings and keep the paper well organized. If you copy and paste the question into your response, please ensure that you write one page at least. You may collaborate and you may use any sources you wish including our text, videos, slides, and outside sources. You may use your PCAs but do not simply cut and past them (particularly for the short answers in Q#1).

Question #1: Please use the DIRE structure (Define, In other words, Relevance, Example) to explain five out of the eight concepts below. Your choice.
Exclusionary Rule
Fourth Amendment
Nationalization of US Constitution
Searches not requiring a warrant
Stop and Frisk
Probable Cause
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
Reasonable Suspicion

Question #2: For the past two months we have been considering the tension between liberty and security. Write a one-page response to the questions below:

Does the tension result in a balancing of important rights, or an erosion of important rights?

What is the US Supreme Court’s role in resolving this tension over time?

What role do the police play in balancing the interests of liberty and security?

What recommendations would you make to improve the ability of police and the courts to balance the sometimes conflicting interests of liberty and security?

Question #3: Several weeks ago, we watched a short documentary regarding the tensions that spilled over on January 6, 2021 (the “Capitol Riot”) concerning the 2020 US Presidential Election. Considering the video and news objectively and not politically, what issues regarding policing, the Constitution, crimes, arrests, public and private property, were revealed, as relevant to our study?

Question #4: Please review the US Supreme Court case summary below regarding Torres v Madrid (Sup Ct., slip opinion, March 25, 2021)
Part A: Apply the IRAC structure to the Torres case in order to provide a summary of the case (case brief).
• Issue(s)
• Rule(s)
• Application to the facts
• Conclusion(s)
Part B
• Consider the Torres v. Madrid et al. case and apply it to any issues we have discussed including US Constitutional application to states, the 4th Amendment, seizures, use of force, police conduct, role of the US Supreme Court, and any other you think are important.

What are the ramifications of ignoring fire prevention and education?

Assignment 8 FSMT188

Week Eight Assignment: For this assignment, write a 1000 Word APA 7th edition formatted paper using our weekly readings, America Burning, America Burning Revisited, America at Risk, the internet as well as professional journals, articles and other academically recognized sources on the following topic:

Address the historical progression of the fire problem in the United States. Identify and delineate on several factors that help explain the disparity between the high aggregate costs of fire for the nation, states, and communities, and lower perceptions of fire risks and costs. What are the ramifications of ignoring fire prevention and education?

Make sure to read Fire Death Rate Trends in order to help formulate your opinion.

You must use at least two sources for citations and include these sources in your APA formatted reference section.

Why do you suppose grand juries operate in some states and not others?Should grand juries be the sole charging mechanism of choice across the country?

Why do you suppose grand juries operate in some states and not others?Should grand juries be the sole charging mechanism of choice across the country? Make an argument supporting your position,

Make sure your answers reflect knowledge of the material in Chapter 11.

These are the professor’s notes

The textbook is Criminal Procedure (Justice Series) (Subscription) by John L. Worall. 3rd edition.

What would you do now if you were a police detective in this situation?

Detective

Three months after the victim was shot, doctors tell the police that the victim is about to die. Because the victim has been in and out of consciousness at the hospital ever since the shooting, the police have not conducted any identification procedures with the victim, although they have identified the prime suspect.

What would you do now if you were a police detective in this situation?
Explain your answer.

Discuss the employee performance evaluation rater and rating errors.Which errors do you feel are most common?

Designing and Implementing a Personnel Evaluation System

Discuss the employee performance evaluation rater and rating errors.Which errors do you feel are most common? Have you ever experienced an evaluation where the rater made any or all of these errors?

As a police supervisor, do you feel you are more of a category I or category II time manager?> why do you feel that way? Provide in detail the steps you would follow in becoming a category II supervisor.

Does the tension result in a balancing of important rights, or an erosion of important rights?

Midterm

General Instructions: Respond to the questions below. Single space your answers with 12 point font. Write at least one page per question – you may write more. Use headings and keep the paper well organized. If you copy and paste the question into your response,ensure that you write one page at least. You may collaborate and you may use any sources you wish including our text, videos, slides, and outside sources. You may use your PCAs but do not simply cut and past them (particularly for the short answers in Q#1).

Question #1: Use the DIRE structure (Define, In other words, Relevance, Example) to explain five out of the eight concepts below. Your choice.
Exclusionary Rule
Fourth Amendment
Nationalization of US Constitution
Searches not requiring a warrant
Stop and Frisk
Probable Cause
Reasonable Expectation of Privacy
Reasonable Suspicion

Question #2: For the past two months we have been considering the tension between liberty and security. Write a one-page response to the questions below:
Does the tension result in a balancing of important rights, or an erosion of important rights?
What is the US Supreme Court’s role in resolving this tension over time?
What role do the police play in balancing the interests of liberty and security?
What recommendations would you make to improve the ability of police and the courts to balance the sometimes conflicting interests of liberty and security?

Question #3: Several weeks ago, we watched a short documentary regarding the tensions that spilled over on January 6, 2021 (the “Capitol Riot”) concerning the 2020 US Presidential Election. Considering the video and news objectively and not politically, what issues regarding policing, the Constitution, crimes, arrests, public and private property, were revealed, as relevant to our study?

Question #4: Review the US Supreme Court case summary below regarding Torres v Madrid (Sup Ct., slip opinion, March 25, 2021)
Part A: Apply the IRAC structure to the Torres case in order to provide a summary of the case (case brief).
• Issue(s)
• Rule(s)
• Application to the facts
• Conclusion(s)
Part B
• Consider the Torres v. Madrid et al. case and apply it to any issues we have discussed including US Constitutional application to states, the 4th Amendment, seizures, use of force, police conduct, role of the US Supreme Court, and any other you think are important.

Discuss any controversies with an argument in the end of what you think and what influenced that opinion.

Research Paper (25%)

You will write an 8–10 page APA–style paper on the topic of your choice. The paper will need to explain the historical context, describe the applicable legislation, describe and analyze the main features of the topic, and discuss any controversies surrounding the topic. Provide an argument towards the end of your paper discussing what you think and what influenced opinions/decisions on this topic—whether it be from the judiciary, the public, or some other relevant institution or group. The paper must be in APA format, double spaced, 12–point Times New Roman font, and with normal 2.54 cm margins all around. It should be a maximum of 8–10 pages not including the reference list pages. Please refer to ‘Grading Rubric B’ (Appendix B) in the syllabus. If you would like to write on a topic that is not listed email me for approval through MyLS.

You may write about one of the topics generally, or focus on a specific case (e.g., a specific sexual offender,first responder, a case before the Ontario Review Board, etc.).

Suggested Topics:
• The Mental Health of First Responders
• Prisons and Mental Health
• Mental Health Courts
• Ontario Review Board
• Psychiatry and the Criminal Justice System
• Sexual Offenders
• The Relationship between Mental Health and Criminality
• Patient Rights
• Unconditional Discharges
• Treatment (historical or current)
• Institutionalization
• Criminalization of the Mentally Ill

The paper will need to:
• explain the historical context
• describe the applicable legislation
• describe and analyze the main features of the topic
• discuss any controversies with an argument in the end of what you think and what influenced that opinion.