Whom can you expect to take part in the trial process and what roles will they play in your trial?

Description

In each of the following situations, which source of law takes priority, and why?

The state statute conflicts with the common law of that state. (75 words, 1 paragraph)

A federal statute conflicts with the U.S. Constitution. (75 words, 1 paragraph)

A common-law decision in one state conflicts with the U.S. Constitution. (75 words, 1 paragraph)

A federal statute conflicts with a state constitution. (75 words, 1 paragraph)

For this prompt, be sure to reference at least one scholarly source to support your answer for each set of conflicting items.

You are the administrator of a local hospital. A trial court has made a finding against your hospital due to the death of a patient during surgery. However, you believe the hospital should be not be found guilty under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur since the surgeon has also been found guilty of malpractice and negligent homicide. Describe the process you would follow to appeal the trial court’s finding against the hospital. (225–300 words, 3–4 paragraphs)

For this prompt, be sure to reference at least two scholarly sources to support your answer.

You are being accused of a breach of contract and will be participating in a trial. Whom can you expect to take part in the trial process and what roles will they play in your trial? Please explain your answer. (225–300 words, 3–4 paragraphs)

For this prompt, be sure to reference at least two scholarly sources to support your answer.

The Constitution specifies that federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction over admiralty claims. Mr. and Mrs. Price have a claim against Fun-time Cruise Lines based out of Miami, Florida, for negligence of the cruise line. Mrs. Price sustained injuries because of the company’s negligence while taking a cruise to the Caribbean. The Price family lives in Seattle, Washington. Can they bring their claim in state court, or must they bring their claim in federal court? Which court or courts could be the trial court with jurisdiction over the claim? Please explain your answer. (225–300 words, 3–4 paragraphs)

For this prompt, be sure to reference at least two scholarly sources to support your answer.

Does the death penalty violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment?Discusss

State whether you support or are against the death penalty and why.
Does the death penalty violate the cruel and unusual punishment clause of the Eighth Amendment?
Is it legal to execute someone who has intellectual disabilities?
Is it legal to execute someone who is mentally ill?
Be sure to support your answer with scholarly sources and appellate court opinions.

What is the Average years of education for Group 3 (SWAT Officers)?

Steps for analysis in Excel:

Cut and paste the data from the table above into Microsoft Excel.
Click the Data tab and then the Data Analysis button to open the statistical analysis dialogue box.
Choose “ANOVA: Single Factor” as the type of analysis.
Click into the input range box, and then highlight all of the data (to include the headers) in the Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 columns.
Click the Labels in First Row box to ensure Excel does not try to analyze the column headers as data.
Click the New Worksheet Ply button so that Excel spits the data output into a new worksheet.
Click “OK” to run the analysis.
Step 2: Answer the following questions using the analysis results that you generated:

What is the average years of education for Group 1 (Narcotics Investigators)?
What is the Average years of education for Group 3 (SWAT Officers)?
What is the p-value for your ANOVA model? Is the p-value greater than or less than 0.05?
Do you reject or accept the null hypothesis that states, “There is no difference between the groups in years of education.”
Why did you reject or accept the null hypothesis?
Which group, on average, has the most years of education?