Demonstrate a critical understanding of the problems of major investigations and the approaches to deal with them.

A Critical Analysis of the Investigation into the Murders of Holly Wells and Jessica Chapman
You will undertake a 3000 word critique on one significant major investigation selected from seven available case studies.
A critical assessment of the investigation by the police of a specified case. The critique should examine selected investigative and/or forensic strategies used by the police comparing and contrasting them with best practice found in the College of Policing’s Authorised Professional Practice, the Murder Investigation Manual 2006 and The Major Incident Room Standardised Administrative Procedures (MIRSAP) 2005. A good assignment will include a critical review of the application of key legislation. A critique of a case study is designed to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of current thinking in the area of major investigation and intelligence led policing.
Learning Outcomes
Demonstrate a critical understanding of the problems of major investigations and the approaches to deal with them.
Understand the strategies and the role of the personnel engaged during major investigations together with the strategic intelligence requirements.
Provide a critical understanding of the techniques and methods utilised within major investigations and intelligence led policing operations

What type of wrongful custodial death claim would this case fall under? Explain your answer.

Read the news article on wrongful death in a Texas state jail:

http://www.texastribune.org/texas-dept-criminal-justice/texas-department-of-criminal-justice/tdcj-files-wrongful-death-lawsuit/

Answer the following questions in a Microsoft Word document:

1. What type of wrongful custodial death claim would this case fall under? Explain your answer.

2. Who would the claim be filed against and why?

3. Using Table 13.1 of your textbook, state the issue of this case, which amendment would be applied, if there is a case that has already set a precedent for addressing this issue and provide a summary of that case, and the standard of review.

Compare the similarities and differences for the case from the episode to the case in the paper . Basically, you must provide conclusions and discussion about the first case and connect that to the paper.

Spring 2022 FORS 4]20@3 Fundamentals of Forensic Bio Case

Case Discussion Use this discussion board for the case discussion assignment.
Watch the episode of Forensic Files and read the paper posted. The video quiz contains five questions . Each correct response will count as extra credit on your final exam.
Compare the similarities and differences for the case from the episode to the case in the paper . Basically, you must provide conclusions and discussion about the first case and connect that to the paper. Word count 200-word minimum and 500-word maximum. write professionally and be sure to proofread your work.
If you have any problems accessing any of the papers, please let me know. You can download the paper through the NGL library website/Research. Although not mandatory, I encourage_you to comment on each other’s posts . This assignment is due by May 4th.
Case Discussion Video

Discuss how tool mark evidence analysis has changed in the last 50 years.Discuss how forensic investigators analyze evidence from tools and tool marks to help solve crimes.

Week 7 Writing Assignment

1. Discuss the value of impressions as class evidence and their ability to provide evidence of possible suspect(s) and crime-scene events.

2. Discuss three ways dental impressions provide information during a forensic investigation and its reliability as evidence in criminal proceedings.

3. Discuss the advances in analyzing impression evidence.

4. Discuss how tool mark evidence analysis has changed in the last 50 years.

5. Discuss how forensic investigators analyze evidence from tools and tool marks to help solve crimes.

Requirements:

Microsoft Word document
100 word minimum for each response to each question , double-spaced, 12 pt. font, Times New Roman
Put your name, course and section number at the top of the document
Be accurate, complete, and grammatically correct

What topics stood out to you? What was your perspective on class topics prior to class discussion? How did class discussion impact that stance?

Seminar in Corrections Reflection

In no less than 5 double-spaced pages , discuss how your perspective on carceral systems has changed or expanded over the course of the semester. While you can use “I” statements, please ensure that each written sentence is complete and has purpose.

Cite and engage with at least 5 sources from class- this can include, articles, text chapters, podcasts, videos, or guest speakers. What topics stood out to you? What was your perspective on class topics prior to class discussion? How did class discussion impact that stance? How do you feel like we should move forward to reduce harm and hold individuals accountable? Conclude the paper by discussing how your current perspective may inform your next steps, decisions, the way you speak, and future conversations.

To what extent should the Commerce Clause be used by the federal government to achieve noncommercial purposes?

Papers that use in-text citation will automatically fail. Use author note format for footnotes according to the Chicago Manual of Style.

No outside research is required; however, if you choose, you may include secondary scholarly literature. Do NOT cite wikipedia, oyez, or similar websites. These sites can be useful
starting points or resources to aid in understanding, but it’s not scholarly to cite them. So don’t.

To what extent should the Commerce Clause be used by the federal government to achieve
noncommercial purposes? Use at least three of the following cases in your paper: U.S. v. E.C.
Knight, Hammer v. Dagenhart, NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel, Heart of Atlanta v. U.S., U.S. v. Lopez,
Gonzales v. Raich.

What topics stood out to you? What was your perspective on class topics prior to class discussion? How did class discussion impact that stance? How do you feel like we should move forward to reduce harm and hold individuals accountable?

In no less than 5 double-spaced pages ,discuss how your perspective on carceral systems has changed or expanded over the course of the semester. While you can use “I” statements, please ensure that each written sentence is complete and has purpose.

Cite and engage with at least 5 sources from class- this can include, articles, text chapters, podcasts, videos, or guest speakers.

What topics stood out to you? What was your perspective on class topics prior to class discussion? How did class discussion impact that stance? How do you feel like we should move forward to reduce harm and hold individuals accountable? Conclude the paper by discussing how your current perspective may inform your next steps, decisions, the way you speak, and future conversations.

To what extent should the Commerce Clause be used by the federal government to achieve noncommercial purposes?

Papers that use in-text citation will automatically fail. Use author note format for footnotes according to the Chicago Manual of Style.

To what extent should the Commerce Clause be used by the federal government to achieve noncommercial purposes? Use at least three of the following cases in your paper: U.S. v. E.C.
Knight, Hammer v. Dagenhart, NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel, Heart of Atlanta v. U.S., U.S. v. Lopez,
Gonzales v. Raich.

Is the restorative justice model the way of the future in managing ex-felons as they return to the community? Do we realistically have the resources to provide parolees with the time and attention to truly affect change?

Restorative Justice Model 

Restorative Justice Model Discussion
Is the restorative justice model the way of the future in managing ex-felons as they return to the community? Do we realistically have the resources to provide parolees with the time and attention to truly affect change? If not, what can be done besides giving up on essential legal and moral principles?
Answer the questions stated above and provide an explanation. Your response should be a minimum of 250 words. Failure to meet the word minimum will result in 10 points being deducted and 15 points deducted if the post is below 200 words

Is further information needed to determine where each person was sitting? What information would you need to know in order to determine where each person was sitting?

Billy Martin

On December 25, 1989, New York Yankees manager, Billy Martin, died in a single vehicle car accident. Martin was found driver seat and his injured friend, William Reedy, was found in the passenger seat of the vehicle. Both men had been consuming alcohol prior to the accident. Reedy originally told police he was the driver of the vehicle. Reedy later recanted his statement, saying he lied to protect his friend. There were also rumors that Martin was not driving the vehicle and Reedy moved Martin’s body to the driver seat of the vehicle to protect himself from being arrest for driving under the influence.

Answer the following:

Research evidence from the autopsy that might provide evidence as to where each person was sitting at the time of the accident.
Based on the information you located, is further information needed to determine where each person was sitting?
What information would you need to know in order to determine where each person was sitting?