Apply revision, editing, and proofreading strategies to substantially revise your final draft, demonstrating substantial revision of your Unit 6 Assignment and Unit 8 Discussion Board post.

As the final draft version of the paper you began in Unit 5, your Unit 8 Assignment should demonstrate your ability to do the following:

Focus on a single, specific, relevant, recent, and researchable change, either positive or negative, in your general field of study.
Organize your information logically, using clear transitions
Use appropriate formal third person language, avoiding first and second person language
Integrate 3-4 relevant and reliable, peer reviewed sources and demonstrate the ability to summarize and paraphrase source information rather than relying on quotes
Apply current APA citations format to credit any and all uses of source information, both when you use the source information within the paragraphs and in an alphabetically listed References page
Apply revision, editing, and proofreading strategies to substantially revise your final draft, demonstrating substantial revision of your Unit 6 Assignment and Unit 8 Discussion Board post.

Critically analyse resistances you identified in the case study and provide recommendations for addressing them.

Managing change – communication plan

The assignment requires you to use the case study provided on the module webpage: Carlin, J., Dean, A. Kern, D., Searcy, R., & Stanley, J. W.

the Game at Cherokee Nation Entertainment. 17(3), 23-40.

• Complete an analysis of the stakeholders in the case study, focusing on their attitudes and power.

• Critically analyse resistances you identified in the case study and provide recommendations for addressing them.

•Prepare a communication plan for one aspect of the case study, using the following communication plan table as a template.

How does this concept relate to Leopold and what does wonder in wild things show Aimee about herself?

WILDERNESS LITERATURE

The Aesthetics of Wilderness

Assignment: Sand County Almanac, World of Wonders, Wilderness Letter

Leopold writes that we begin “in nature, as in art: with the pretty”. For this assignment, consider the role of wilderness in defining the self using Sand County Almanac, World of Wonders, and Wallace Stegner’s Wilderness Letter. Your focus should be on how this aesthetic idea shape Aimee Nezhukumatathil’s view of not only the wilderness but her self. In order to do this, you should define Leopold’s claim using evidence from Sand County Almanac as well as Stegner’s Letter, using these ideas to build a conversation with at least three essays in World of Wonders.

OR

Wonder is an essential element in Aimee Nez collection. How does this concept relate to Leopold and what does wonder in wild things show Aimee about herself? Using at least three essays in WoW build a direct conversation with Leopold while answering this question. For extra credit, incorporate at least two works from Black Nature into this essay.

Essays are 5-7 pages, double spaced, should use MLA formatting, and include a Works Cited page. Additional criteria may be provided, but students should look to the guidelines for Essay Grades on the syllabus.

Discuss how you find a good fit between the research question you ask; the method you apply; the cases you select to study and the data you choose to collect.

Impact of national culture on entrepreneurial orientation

What is this seminar about?

Discuss how you find a good fit between the research question you ask; the method you apply; the cases you select to study and the data you choose to collect.

Presentation – What to present during the method seminar

In the method seminar, each group will do a five minute presentation. Supervisors will provide feedback based on the presentation and the research proposals that you have submitted. Your presentation need to cover the following 5 points:

1. Our research question

2. Why it is relevant

3. The method we apply

4. The cases we plan to study and why

5. The data we plan to collect and why

Why Ken Lay continued to perpetuate the myth that Enron is doing well? The film suggest that he is either a crook or an idiot. Which term do you think better describes him?

Enron: Smartest Guys in the Room

Watch the film “Enron – Smartest Guys in the Room”. Read the following questions and answer any THREE of them. Couple paragraphs per questions are enough.

Skilling emphasized in his testimony before Congress that he was only acting in the interests of the shareholders. Do you agree? Are there other people whose interests should Skilling also have been protecting?

What message does the movie deliver regarding regulation versus “free markets”? Do you think this message is appropriate?

Are there certain characteristics of services or products which suggest that regulation of the markets in which those services or products are delivered is more or less necessary? Does the market for electricity have those characteristics? What about other markets? Explain.
One of the people interviewed in the movie states that there existed a “high school mythology” at Enron. What did she mean by that? Was that good or bad for Enron and its stakeholders?
According to the movie, Enron emphasized a “rank and yank” model of employee evaluation. Explain the model and discuss whether this is a reasonable approach for a successful organization.
After watching the movie, whose behavior was the worst – Ken Lay, Jeff Skilling, or Andy Fastow? Who received the harshest punishment?
How did Enron’s executives use Arthur Andersen, Vinson and Elkins, and Wall Street as a defense for their actions? Note that, of these organizations, only Arthur Andersen was put out of business in the post-Enron period. Why was the accounting firm held to an apparently higher standard? Is this appropriate? Why or why not?
In what way is the Enron scandal similar to what happened in Titanic?
In what way does Miligram’s experiment explains the behavior of Enron’s traders?
Why Ken Lay continued to perpetuate the myth that Enron is doing well? The film suggest that he is either a crook or an idiot. Which term do you think better describes him?