Write a 1-2 paragraph memo explaining the health problem that includes the following: Description of the health issue. Explanation of the severity of the issue (use statistical data).

Scenario
Imagine you are an employee at a local health department, and you need to explain a public health issue to your city council in a concise fashion.

Instructions
Using statistical data from the CDC Wonder database, select a health problem that exists in your community. Write a 1-2 paragraph memo explaining the health problem that includes the following:

Description of the health issue.
Explanation of the severity of the issue (use statistical data).
Why the health issue should be addressed
Who is most affected by the health issue
What consequences may occur if the health issue is not addressed

Summarize the position set forth in justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion?

Prepare a formal case brief where the learner discusses:
1.the important facts,
2.the issue is in the case,
3.the final holding,
4.the reasoning behind the court’s decisions.

1- single page
answer the following questions.

1.what classification of patents is involved in this decision?
2. Did Ebay win on the issue before the Supreme Court?
3. Summarize the position set forth in justice Kennedy’s concurring opinion?

Discuss whether Mr. Johnson made a good faith effort to offer reasonable accommodations to Ms. Djarra or whether Mr. Johnson could not reasonably accommodate Ms. Djarra without undue hardship.

Description

Week 5 Assignment

The Religious Discrimination – Reasonable Accommodations

Important facts to capture

Determines Whether Ms. Djarra Established a Prima Facie Case of Religious Discrimination Against Her by Mr. Johnson

Discusses Whether Mr. Johnson Offered Reasonable Accommodations to Ms. Djarra

Identifies the Amount and Type of Damages to Be Awarded

Assume the role of the judge in the Dress Code Flips Burger Joint case. Analyze the legal issues presented by the parties and state how you would rule on each of the issues presented. Remember that your ruling should be based on your legal analysis and not on your own personal views. Use the IRAC method to apply the law to the facts and reach a legal conclusion based on your analysis.

Your legal analysis should summarize the legal framework that applies to religious discrimination cases under Title VII (see EEOC v. Alamo Rent-A-Car LLC, Tiano v. Dillards Dept. Stores, Inc, and Cloutier v. Costco Wholesale Corp) and then:

• Determine whether Ms. Djarra established a prima facie case of religious discrimination against her by Mr. Johnson.

• Discuss whether Mr. Johnson made a good faith effort to offer reasonable accommodations to Ms. Djarra or whether Mr. Johnson could not reasonably accommodate Ms. Djarra without undue hardship.

• Identify the types of damages available under Title VII and the type and amount of damages to be awarded to Ms. Djarra, if any.

How would you advise a potential foreign corporation to manage the intricacies (complexities and risks) of China’s political-legal environment?

After reading and the attached case study titled “China Big Opportunities, Complicated Risks”, recommend a perspective a multinational corporation could use to make sense of the political situation in China, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic outbreak. How would you advise a potential foreign corporation to manage the intricacies (complexities and risks) of China’s political-legal environment? Remember that a foreign corporation is the one investing, outsourcing or doing business with China.

Explain why achieving these goals will be beneficial to you.

Write a 3- to 4- page essay (double spaced, APA format in style and references ) analyzing your own health and wellness from an exercise science standpoint by addressing the following:

Evaluate your own current health status by as many of the health status categories included below as you can and describe the results:

Medical history review – Thyroid cancer, hypothyroidism and diabetes
Risk factor identification and stratification
Prescribed medications Synthyroid and Metformin
Level of physical activity – I go to the gym 3 times a week
Fitness testing you can perform on yourself
Next, write 3 – 4 paragraphs summarizing your current health status, including cardiorespiratory health, muscular strength and endurance, and flexibility. Write 1 – 2 paragraphs specifying your personal fitness goals as they relate to your overall health. Explain why achieving these goals will be beneficial to you. Now, create an exercise plan for yourself that reflects your current health status and personal fitness goals. Be sure to explain how your exercise plan reflects total fitness. Support your exercise prescription and the expected health benefits by discussing properly cited information from at least two peer- reviewed articles.

Conclude your paper with a short summary of why fitness is important to health and how attaining the goals you have set will be beneficial to your personal health and wellness. Be sure to include specific examples from the course readings to support your points and to cite in the proper APA style. You must discuss cited information from two peer-reviewed articles found in the Library to support and validate the ideas and information shared in your paper.

Discuss the differences between a subpoena and a court order.

1. What is health information and why is it important to protect?
2. What federal laws offer protection related to patient information?
3. What is the difference between privacy and confidentiality?
4. How is security related to privacy and confidentiality?
5. Who owns the patient health record and who controls the use of the information
within the record?
6. Describe the role of the custodian of health records.
7. Discuss the differences between a subpoena and a court order.
8. Give examples of two questions that a custodian of a health record can answer
at deposition or trial. Give examples of two questions that should not be
responded to.
Case Discussion
A patient has filed a $3 million medical malpractice lawsuit against St. Patrick Hospital. In
light of the patient’s litigious background and the facts of the case, hospital
administration is adamant that it is not liable. It has instructed its legal counsel to
proceed toward trial, where it may be absolved of liability.
9. Is the hospital’s decision to proceed toward trial a wise one? Why or why not?
10. What other options does the hospital have?
11. Besides the financial resources required to legally defend itself, identify at least
two non-monetary factors that the hospital must take into consideration when
deciding to proceed toward trial?
12. What risks does the hospital assume when it takes a case to trial?
Scenario:
During a school field trip to a local orchard, 13-year-old Johnny Chapman fell out
of a tree while picking apples. That evening, his parents took him to the emergency room
at Woodville Hospital, where he was diagnosed with a fractured ulna. He was admitted
and surgery was necessary. Johnny was discharged after a two-day stay. Johnny’s
parents subsequently sued the school system and two of the three parent chaperones
who had volunteered for failing to safeguard Johnny during the field trip and failing to
seek emergency medical care.
Three months later, the health information department director at Woodville
Hospital, Jay Forshall, was subpoenaed with directions to bring Johnny’s record to a
deposition the following day. The deposition was being held in Columbia City, which was
125 miles away. Jay complied with the subpoena by preparing Johnny’s medical record.
Woodville Hospital’s health record was hybrid, so Jay printed out the electronic
components from the hospital’s electronic health record system and collected the
remaining components that existed on paper.
Jay drove to Columbia City the following morning. During the deposition, legal
counsel for the Chapmans proceeded to ask Jay about Johnny’s medical record. Jay was
asked to verify that the record was Johnny’s and that it was prepared in the usual course
of business. He was then asked about the contents of the record. One question posed to
him was whether Tylenol, which had been administered to Johnny at the hospital, was
given to lessen Johnny’s pain. Jay stated that he presumed legal counsel’s statement
was true, as that is a common reason for Tylenol to be given. Jay was also asked to read
an otherwise illegible note that the physician, Dr. Fogle, had written on the discharge
instruction sheet. Dr. Fogle was a visiting physician, and Jay was not familiar with her
handwriting. Nonetheless, he tried his best to assist legal counsel in deciphering the
note.
Jay was not involved in the case any further following the deposition. Several
months later, he read in the newspaper that the case had gone to trial. One of the parent
chaperones who was initially sued never responded to the complaint and did not
participate in any of the proceedings, including the trial. A jury rendered a verdict against
the school system and the three parent chaperones, with all being required to pay money
damages.
13. Based on the facts, a motion to quash the subpoena (thus nullifying it) could
have been granted based on what two reasons?
14. What questions asked of Jay Forshall during the deposition were inappropriate?