Does this paper contain only relevant information? Are the citations completed properly?Is/are the philosopher’s view presented with the appropriate level of detail?  Does the author present a clear argument in his/her discussion?

Visit the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy found here . Pick one of the arguments from section 3 and present it. Then, determine what James Rachels and Ray Prebble might say about it. Which argument do you think better lives up to the standards of philosophy?

1. Does this paper identify have a clear thesis?
2. Does this paper contain only relevant information? Are the citations completed properly?

3. Does the paper attribute the correct view to the philosophers in question?

4. Is/are the philosopher’s view presented with the appropriate level of detail?
Does the author present a clear argument in his/her discussion?

6. Does the paper cohere? Or, is the paper a hodgepodge of disparate ideas? . Does the conclusion tie together the different phases of the paper? Or, is the conclusion a non-sequitur?

8. Are the spelling, grammar and syntax on the college level?. Does the author make appropriate and accurate use of course concepts in constructing his or her discussion?