Does the implied bill of rights doctrine still apply to limit Quebec’s ability to limit religious rights even though it properly invoked section 33 of the Charter to suspend those rights when passing Bill 21?
In your legal opinion, does the implied bill of rights doctrine still apply to limit Quebec’s ability to limit religious rights even though it properly invoked section 33 of the Charter to suspend those rights when passing Bill 21?
Recall that since the implied bill of rights doctrine decisions, the Charter has been enshrined into law and it explicitly guarantees religious freedom under the Charter which can also be suspended by the government’s use of section 33 of the Charter.
Fully explain your answer in terms of any applicable case law, legal articles and any other relevant sources you discover in crafting your essay.
lease check attached pdf for full instructions.
