Does this go beyond the presented material and introduce new insights? If data is used, is it used correctly, and does it illustrate the position clearly?

Antitrust case against Apple

ESSAY PART TWO MARKING CRITERIA.
Again, the second essay is marked out of a hundred. The overall mark is adjusted to be holistic, and therefore may not be simply the sum of the categories.
For this essay, the criteria are drawn to reflect the multiple approaches possible in looking at these cases.

Having read through the whole article, do I find it persuasive, interesting, thought provoking, analytical or of overall interest?
Case Background Are the cases clearly laid out, is the information factually correct, do they present the correct point of law and or economics?
Case Analysis Does the case analysis break down correctly the economics of the case? Does it draw good conclusions regarding the way the case9s) illustrate principles, or about whether the cases may illustrate antitrust practice?
Are the conclusions logically drawn from the analysis? Do they point to real world possibilities, indicate either successes or failures of anititust practices? Do they point to difficulties with the philosophy of antitrust or suggest solutions?
Style, examples, communication, creativity and independent research
Does this go beyond the presented material and introduce new insights?
If data is used, is it used correctly, and does it illustrate the position clearly?
Is the writing clear and pleasurable to read?